Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01092 v4 pith:DQCEZEBT submitted 2024-02-02 stat.ML cond-mat.dis-nncs.LG

A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws

classification stat.ML cond-mat.dis-nncs.LG
keywords modelscalingtrainingneuraltimeperformancesizecompute-optimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/\textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $\textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spectral Dynamics in Deep Networks: Feature Learning, Outlier Escape, and Learning Rate Transfer

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A two-level DMFT predicts width-consistent outlier escape and hyperparameter transfer under μP in deep networks, with bulk restructuring dominating for tasks with many outputs.

  2. Sharp Capacity Scaling of Spectral Optimizers in Learning Associative Memory

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Muon achieves higher storage capacity than SGD and matches Newton's method in one-step recovery rates for associative memory under power-law distributions, while saturating at larger critical batch sizes and showing f...

  3. Universal One-third Time Scaling in Learning Peaked Distributions

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    Softmax + cross-entropy on peaked targets yields loss ∼ t^{−1/3}, giving an architecture-driven explanation for power-law LLM training time without power-law data.

  4. Spectral Dynamics in Deep Networks: Feature Learning, Outlier Escape, and Learning Rate Transfer

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-level DMFT tracks bulk and outlier spectral dynamics in wide networks, predicting width-consistent outlier growth and hyperparameter transfer under muP scaling for deep linear nets while noting bulk restructurin...

  5. Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning Regime

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    For diagonal and quadratic two-layer networks, training maps to LASSO and matrix compressed sensing, yielding a full phase diagram of excess-risk scaling exponents and a spectral characterization of the trained weights.

  6. Anatomy of Post-Training: Using Interpretability to Characterize Data and Shape the Learning Signal

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A new pipeline uses interpretability to characterize concepts in preference data and shape rewards via feature or data interventions during LM post-training.

  7. Theory of learning of high-dimensional controlled non-linear dynamical systems (I): models and methods

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces models for neural ODEs trained with online SGD and derives their high-dimensional learning curves via dynamical mean field theory.

  8. Law of Neural Interaction: Depth-Width Shape, Interaction Efficiency, and Generalization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tuning the depth-width ratio positions models in an efficient neural interaction interval that correlates with better generalization under fixed budgets and remains stable with scale.

  9. Neural Scaling Universality: If Exponents Are Fixed, Time to Understand Coefficients

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Position paper claims fixed exponents in scaling laws arise from generic mechanisms while coefficients vary with data and architecture, making the latter the focus for improvements.

  10. Unifying Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Transformers Scaling Law

    cs.LG 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0

    Claims a two-stage transformer scaling law (exponential then C^{-1/6}) with matching bounds, but the lower bounds are missing, the exponent is inconsistent (-1/7 vs -1/6), and the law is an artifact of hand-set M = Θ(...

  11. Statistical Properties of Training & Generalization

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Neural scaling laws in deep learning interact with physics constraints and inductive biases beyond classical statistics.

  12. There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning

    stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A mechanics of the learning process is emerging in deep learning theory, characterized by dynamics, coarse statistics, and falsifiable predictions across idealized settings, limits, laws, hyperparameters, and universa...

  13. Statistical Properties of Training & Generalization

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review of neural scaling laws and their relation to constraints and inductive biases when applying machine learning to physics problems.