Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Isotropy, Clusters, and Classifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03191 v3 pith:WRYQ4TFJ submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords embeddingisotropybeenclustersspaceswhetheraccruedclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Whether embedding spaces use all their dimensions equally, i.e., whether they are isotropic, has been a recent subject of discussion. Evidence has been accrued both for and against enforcing isotropy in embedding spaces. In the present paper, we stress that isotropy imposes requirements on the embedding space that are not compatible with the presence of clusters -- which also negatively impacts linear classification objectives. We demonstrate this fact both mathematically and empirically and use it to shed light on previous results from the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Meaning at the Planck scale? Contextualized word embeddings for doing history, philosophy, and sociology of science

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Domain-adapted BERT models distinguish senses of 'Planck' better than general models, and reveal the rise of the Planck mission meaning in physics papers.

Pith tools