REVIEW 1 cited by
Isotropy, Clusters, and Classifiers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Whether embedding spaces use all their dimensions equally, i.e., whether they are isotropic, has been a recent subject of discussion. Evidence has been accrued both for and against enforcing isotropy in embedding spaces. In the present paper, we stress that isotropy imposes requirements on the embedding space that are not compatible with the presence of clusters -- which also negatively impacts linear classification objectives. We demonstrate this fact both mathematically and empirically and use it to shed light on previous results from the literature.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Meaning at the Planck scale? Contextualized word embeddings for doing history, philosophy, and sociology of science
Domain-adapted BERT models distinguish senses of 'Planck' better than general models, and reveal the rise of the Planck mission meaning in physics papers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.