Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

De-amplifying Bias from Differential Privacy in Language Model Fine-tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04489 v1 pith:PNQAQSO6 submitted 2024-02-07 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CYstat.ME

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CYstat.ME
keywords biasprivacyfairnessmodelsmodelamplificationdatadifferential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fairness and privacy are two important values machine learning (ML) practitioners often seek to operationalize in models. Fairness aims to reduce model bias for social/demographic sub-groups. Privacy via differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, on the other hand, limits the impact of any individual's training data on the resulting model. The trade-offs between privacy and fairness goals of trustworthy ML pose a challenge to those wishing to address both. We show that DP amplifies gender, racial, and religious bias when fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), producing models more biased than ones fine-tuned without DP. We find the cause of the amplification to be a disparity in convergence of gradients across sub-groups. Through the case of binary gender bias, we demonstrate that Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA), a known method for addressing bias, also mitigates bias amplification by DP. As a consequence, DP and CDA together can be used to fine-tune models while maintaining both fairness and privacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Differentially-private text generation degrades output language quality

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DP fine-tuning systematically degrades LLM output length, grammatical correctness, and lexical diversity, and this degradation grows as the privacy budget shrinks.

Pith tools