Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Choosing a Classical Planner with Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04874 v1 pith:KVD7S6M2 submitted 2024-01-25 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords plannergraphonlineplanningselectionapproachchoosingclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online planner selection is the task of choosing a solver out of a predefined set for a given planning problem. As planning is computationally hard, the performance of solvers varies greatly on planning problems. Thus, the ability to predict their performance on a given problem is of great importance. While a variety of learning methods have been employed, for classical cost-optimal planning the prevailing approach uses Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). In this work, we continue the line of work on using GNNs for online planner selection. We perform a thorough investigation of the impact of the chosen GNN model, graph representation and node features, as well as prediction task. Going further, we propose using the graph representation obtained by a GNN as an input to the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, resulting in a more resource-efficient yet accurate approach. We show the effectiveness of a variety of GNN-based online planner selection methods, opening up new exciting avenues for research on online planner selection.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TROJAN-GUARD: Hardware Trojans Detection Using GNN in RTL Designs

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 2-layer GCN on RTL dataflow graphs detects hardware trojans with 98.66% precision and 92.30% recall, but the evaluation rests on only 51 designs with no released code or data.

Pith tools