Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coordinated Flaw Disclosure for AI: Beyond Security Vulnerabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07039 v3 pith:D325P45J submitted 2024-02-10 cs.AI cs.CRcs.CY

classification cs.AIcs.CRcs.CY
keywords disclosurecoordinatedapproachflawframeworkprocessreportingsecurity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Harm reporting in Artificial Intelligence (AI) currently lacks a structured process for disclosing and addressing algorithmic flaws, relying largely on an ad-hoc approach. This contrasts sharply with the well-established Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) ecosystem in software security. While global efforts to establish frameworks for AI transparency and collaboration are underway, the unique challenges presented by machine learning (ML) models demand a specialized approach. To address this gap, we propose implementing a Coordinated Flaw Disclosure (CFD) framework tailored to the complexities of ML and AI issues. This paper reviews the evolution of ML disclosure practices, from ad hoc reporting to emerging participatory auditing methods, and compares them with cybersecurity norms. Our framework introduces innovations such as extended model cards, dynamic scope expansion, an independent adjudication panel, and an automated verification process. We also outline a forthcoming real-world pilot of CFD. We argue that CFD could significantly enhance public trust in AI systems. By balancing organizational and community interests, CFD aims to improve AI accountability in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AI

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Security's hard-won transparency practices, from Kerckhoffs' principle to vulnerability disclosure, form three transferable themes for AI transparency efforts.

Pith tools