REVIEW 3 cited by
GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal models (MMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. Yet, their proficiency in tackling geometry math problems, which necessitates an integrated understanding of both textual and visual information, has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems. This benchmark facilitates a deeper investigation into the performance of LLMs and MMs in solving geometry math problems. Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67\% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00\% accuracy on the hard subset. This highlights the critical need for testing models against datasets on which they have not been pre-trained. Additionally, our findings indicate that GPT-series models perform more effectively on problems they have rephrased, suggesting a promising method for enhancing model capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CogMath: Assessing LLMs' Authentic Mathematical Ability from a Human Cognitive Perspective
When math problems are probed through nine human-cognitive dimensions, seven leading LLMs' effective pass rates drop 30 to 40 points below standard accuracy.
-
Towards Geometry Problem Solving in the Large Model Era: A Survey
A survey that organizes geometry problem-solving research into benchmark construction, parsing, and reasoning, and proposes a unified parse-then-reason paradigm for the large-model era.
-
Large Language Models as Computable Approximations to Solomonoff Induction
The paper argues LLMs are computable approximations of Solomonoff induction, but its central derivation recovers the model's own probabilities by construction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.