Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Survey Paper Taxonomy about Large Language Models via Graph Representation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10409 v1 pith:J2H42D4M submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG
keywords modelslanguagesurveytaxonomyllmsresearchfine-tuninggraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As new research on Large Language Models (LLMs) continues, it is difficult to keep up with new research and models. To help researchers synthesize the new research many have written survey papers, but even those have become numerous. In this paper, we develop a method to automatically assign survey papers to a taxonomy. We collect the metadata of 144 LLM survey papers and explore three paradigms to classify papers within the taxonomy. Our work indicates that leveraging graph structure information on co-category graphs can significantly outperform the language models in two paradigms; pre-trained language models' fine-tuning and zero-shot/few-shot classifications using LLMs. We find that our model surpasses an average human recognition level and that fine-tuning LLMs using weak labels generated by a smaller model, such as the GCN in this study, can be more effective than using ground-truth labels, revealing the potential of weak-to-strong generalization in the taxonomy classification task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SurveyReview: A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluators

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SurveyReview is a dataset of 675 surveys with 1,630 reviews annotated into four quality dimensions, plus a fine-tuned evaluator (SurveyAlign) that reports lower error than GPT-5.2 but only reaches majority-class basel...

Pith tools