Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12327 v3 pith:RTYT2BYR submitted 2024-02-19 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.MAecon.GNq-fin.EC

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.MAecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords simulationsagentscooperationsocialspontaneousbehaviorscommunityllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly been utilized in social simulations, where they are often guided by carefully crafted instructions to stably exhibit human-like behaviors during simulations. Nevertheless, we doubt the necessity of shaping agents' behaviors for accurate social simulations. Instead, this paper emphasizes the importance of spontaneous phenomena, wherein agents deeply engage in contexts and make adaptive decisions without explicit directions. We explored spontaneous cooperation across three competitive scenarios and successfully simulated the gradual emergence of cooperation, findings that align closely with human behavioral data. This approach not only aids the computational social science community in bridging the gap between simulations and real-world dynamics but also offers the AI community a novel method to assess LLMs' capability of deliberate reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Other Mind: How Language Models Exhibit Human Temporal Cognition

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Larger LLMs develop a subjective 'present' around the current date, and their year similarity judgments follow a logarithmic Weber-Fechner compression, with supporting neural and representational evidence.

Pith tools