Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Differentially Private Hyper-parameter Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13087 v3 pith:2VXHJVIK submitted 2024-02-20 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords privacytuninghyper-parameterprivateboundprocessauditcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the application of differential privacy in hyper-parameter tuning, a crucial process in machine learning involving selecting the best hyper-parameter from several candidates. Unlike many private learning algorithms, including the prevalent DP-SGD, the privacy implications of tuning remain insufficiently understood or often totally ignored. Recent works propose a generic private selection solution for the tuning process, yet a fundamental question persists: is this privacy bound tight? This paper provides an in-depth examination of this question. Initially, we provide studies affirming the current privacy analysis for private selection is indeed tight in general. However, when we specifically study the hyper-parameter tuning problem in a white-box setting, such tightness no longer holds. This is first demonstrated by applying privacy audit on the tuning process. Our findings underscore a substantial gap between current theoretical privacy bound and the empirical bound derived even under strong audit setups. This gap motivates our subsequent investigations. Our further study provides improved privacy results for private hyper-parameter tuning due to its distinct properties. Our results demonstrate broader applicability compared to prior analyses, which are limited to specific parameter configurations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management: Measuring Sample-level Unlearning Completeness

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IAM interpolates between an original model and a shadow model to score each sample's unlearning completeness, achieving top AUC for exact unlearning and top correlation for approximate unlearning, and exposing under- ...

Pith tools