Pith. sign in

REVIEW 24 cited by

Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.16837 v2 pith:CRSK6HV6 submitted 2024-02-26 cs.CL

Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningentitymulti-hopbridgepromptsevidencefirstlatent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study whether Large Language Models (LLMs) latently perform multi-hop reasoning with complex prompts such as "The mother of the singer of 'Superstition' is". We look for evidence of a latent reasoning pathway where an LLM (1) latently identifies "the singer of 'Superstition'" as Stevie Wonder, the bridge entity, and (2) uses its knowledge of Stevie Wonder's mother to complete the prompt. We analyze these two hops individually and consider their co-occurrence as indicative of latent multi-hop reasoning. For the first hop, we test if changing the prompt to indirectly mention the bridge entity instead of any other entity increases the LLM's internal recall of the bridge entity. For the second hop, we test if increasing this recall causes the LLM to better utilize what it knows about the bridge entity. We find strong evidence of latent multi-hop reasoning for the prompts of certain relation types, with the reasoning pathway used in more than 80% of the prompts. However, the utilization is highly contextual, varying across different types of prompts. Also, on average, the evidence for the second hop and the full multi-hop traversal is rather moderate and only substantial for the first hop. Moreover, we find a clear scaling trend with increasing model size for the first hop of reasoning but not for the second hop. Our experimental findings suggest potential challenges and opportunities for future development and applications of LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 24 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Language models represent their current reasoning in a small, readable set of verbalizable vectors (the J-space) that functions like a global workspace.

  2. DiscoLoop: Looping Discrete Embeddings and Continuous Hidden States for Multi-hop Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    DiscoLoop adds a decoded token-embedding channel to looped transformers, fixing a representation mismatch that limited implicit multi-hop reasoning and improving OOD generalization.

  3. Relational reasoning and inductive bias in transformers and large language models

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In-weights learning induces linear embeddings enabling transitive inference in transformers, whereas in-context learning defaults to match-and-copy unless pre-trained on linear tasks or prompted with linear mental maps.

  4. Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Coconut lets LLMs perform reasoning directly in continuous latent space by recycling hidden states as inputs, outperforming standard chain-of-thought on search-intensive logical tasks with better accuracy-efficiency t...

  5. Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No-CoT 50% task-completion time horizons for frontier models have doubled yearly for six years, reaching over 3 minutes for GPT-5.5, with median projections of 7 minutes by 2028 and 25 minutes by 2030.

  6. The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Power-law data sampling creates beneficial asymmetry in the loss landscape that lets models acquire high-frequency skill compositions first, enabling more efficient learning of rare long-tail skills than uniform distr...

  7. The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Power-law data distributions outperform uniform ones for compositional reasoning by creating asymmetry that lets frequent skill compositions scaffold rare ones with less data.

  8. HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HypEHR is a hyperbolic embedding model for EHR data that uses Lorentzian geometry and hierarchy-aware pretraining to answer clinical questions nearly as well as large language models but with much smaller size.

  9. EHRAG: Bridging Semantic Gaps in Lightweight GraphRAG via Hybrid Hypergraph Construction and Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EHRAG constructs structural hyperedges from sentence co-occurrence and semantic hyperedges from entity embedding clusters, then applies hybrid diffusion plus topic-aware PPR to retrieve top-k documents, outperforming ...

  10. LACE: Lattice Attention for Cross-thread Exploration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LACE enables parallel reasoning paths in LLMs to communicate via lattice attention and error-correct using synthetic training data, improving accuracy by over 7 points over standard parallel search.

  11. SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SeLaR selectively applies latent soft reasoning in LLMs via entropy gating and contrastive regularization, outperforming standard CoT on five benchmarks without training.

  12. Learning Self-Interpretation from Interpretability Artifacts: Training Lightweight Adapters on Vector-Label Pairs

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Training a d_model+1-parameter affine adapter on vector-label pairs lets frozen LMs label their own internal features, beating untrained self-interpretation and the noisy training labels themselves.

  13. Can Aha Moments Be Fake? Towards Quantifying Decorative and True Thinking in Chain-of-Thought

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Chain-of-thought steps in LLMs vary in causal influence; many are decorative, TTS identifies them, and a latent steering direction can switch whether a model 'thinks' through a step.

  14. Can Aha Moments Be Fake? Towards Quantifying Decorative and True Thinking in Chain-of-Thought

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs interleave true causal reasoning steps with decorative ones in CoT, with only ~2.3% of steps having high causal impact on AIME for Qwen-2.5, and a steering direction can force internal use of specific steps.

  15. Attention Illuminates LLM Reasoning: The Preplan-and-Anchor Rhythm Enables Fine-Grained Policy Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    LLM attention maps reveal a preplan-and-anchor pattern, and reweighting RL credit toward the flagged tokens improves math/QA reasoning.

  16. Unveiling the Mechanisms of Multi-Hop Reasoning in Transformers via Identity Bridge

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding identity supervision on bridge tokens enables out-of-distribution two-hop reasoning in simple transformers, with a nuclear-norm theory explaining the benefit.

  17. Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCoRe uses multi-turn online RL with regularization on self-generated traces to improve LLM self-correction, achieving 15.6% and 9.1% gains on MATH and HumanEval for Gemini models.

  18. DiscoLoop: Looping Discrete Embeddings and Continuous Hidden States for Multi-hop Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DiscoLoop adds a discrete embedding channel to looped transformers to fix representational misalignment in two-hop reasoning, yielding near-perfect accuracy on synthetic tasks and better pretraining loss on real data.

  19. Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Frontier AI models' no-CoT 50% task-completion time horizons have doubled yearly over six years, reaching over 3 minutes for GPT-5.5 with projections to 25 minutes by 2030.

  20. NoisyCoconut: Counterfactual Consensus via Latent Space Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Injecting noise into LLM latent trajectories creates diverse reasoning paths whose agreement acts as a confidence signal for selective abstention, cutting error rates from 40-70% to under 15% on math tasks.

  21. HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A 22M-parameter hyperbolic model answers structured EHR questions with accuracy close to LLM-based systems (EHRXQA 89.5%, MIMIC-Instr 76.0%).

  22. LACE: Lattice Attention for Cross-thread Exploration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LACE enables concurrent reasoning paths in LLMs to interact via lattice attention and a synthetic training pipeline, raising accuracy more than 7 points over independent parallel search.

  23. LACE: Lattice Attention for Cross-thread Exploration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LACE adds lattice attention to let parallel LLM reasoning threads interact and correct errors, raising accuracy over 7 points versus standard independent sampling.

  24. Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking

    cs.CL 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Heima compresses verbose CoT into hidden thinking tokens via information-theoretic analysis and an adaptive interpreter, claiming maintained or improved zero-shot accuracy on reasoning benchmarks.