Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17930 v1 pith:3AVEYCX4 submitted 2024-02-27 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords goalcooperativeinstructionassistancefollowinghumaninstructionsinverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

People often give instructions whose meaning is ambiguous without further context, expecting that their actions or goals will disambiguate their intentions. How can we build assistive agents that follow such instructions in a flexible, context-sensitive manner? This paper introduces cooperative language-guided inverse plan search (CLIPS), a Bayesian agent architecture for pragmatic instruction following and goal assistance. Our agent assists a human by modeling them as a cooperative planner who communicates joint plans to the assistant, then performs multimodal Bayesian inference over the human's goal from actions and language, using large language models (LLMs) to evaluate the likelihood of an instruction given a hypothesized plan. Given this posterior, our assistant acts to minimize expected goal achievement cost, enabling it to pragmatically follow ambiguous instructions and provide effective assistance even when uncertain about the goal. We evaluate these capabilities in two cooperative planning domains (Doors, Keys & Gems and VirtualHome), finding that CLIPS significantly outperforms GPT-4V, LLM-based literal instruction following and unimodal inverse planning in both accuracy and helpfulness, while closely matching the inferences and assistive judgments provided by human raters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. S-MARC: Causal Streaming Reasoning for Full-Duplex Conversational Behavior Modeling

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A streaming causal model predicts per-second two-level speech acts and rationale explanations, trained on 120 hours of LLM-synthesized duplex dialogue.

  2. Towards Machine Theory of Mind with Large Language Model-Augmented Inverse Planning

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-augmented Bayesian inverse planning model, LAIP, generates hypotheses and action likelihoods, then uses Bayes' rule to infer agent preferences, outperforming LLM-only baselines.

Pith tools