Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How do Large Language Models Handle Multilingualism?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18815 v3 pith:JQXNXL2O submitted 2024-02-29 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords textttlanguagelanguageslayersllmsmultilingualmworkacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across diverse languages. This study explores how LLMs handle multilingualism. Based on observed language ratio shifts among layers and the relationships between network structures and certain capabilities, we hypothesize the LLM's multilingual workflow ($\texttt{MWork}$): LLMs initially understand the query, converting multilingual inputs into English for task-solving. In the intermediate layers, they employ English for thinking and incorporate multilingual knowledge with self-attention and feed-forward structures, respectively. In the final layers, LLMs generate responses aligned with the original language of the query. To verify $\texttt{MWork}$, we introduce Parallel Language-specific Neuron Detection ($\texttt{PLND}$) to identify activated neurons for inputs in different languages without any labeled data. Using $\texttt{PLND}$, we validate $\texttt{MWork}$ through extensive experiments involving the deactivation of language-specific neurons across various layers and structures. Moreover, $\texttt{MWork}$ allows fine-tuning of language-specific neurons with a small dataset, enhancing multilingual abilities in a specific language without compromising others. This approach results in an average improvement of $3.6\%$ for high-resource languages and $2.3\%$ for low-resource languages across all tasks with just $400$ documents.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Multilingual Self-Taught Faithfulness Evaluators

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    STEMF trains multilingual faithfulness evaluators from synthetic data alone, and English-only training yields the best average results across languages.

  2. What Language(s) Does Aya-23 Think In? How Multilinguality Affects Internal Language Representations

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Aya-23-8B appears to activate multiple related languages internally and concentrate code-mixing neurons in final layers, but the paper's own limitations undercut the claim that these are language-specific neurons.

  3. Seed-X: Building Strong Multilingual Translation LLM with 7B Parameters

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 7B open-weight translation model matches or outperforms far larger commercial systems across 28 languages in automatic and human evaluations.

Pith tools