Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Public-data Assisted Private Stochastic Optimization: Power and Limitations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.03856 v1 pith:EEO6KUPV submitted 2024-03-06 cs.LG cs.CRmath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRmath.OCstat.ML
keywords publictextdataprivatesamplesfracprivsqrt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the limits and capability of public-data assisted differentially private (PA-DP) algorithms. Specifically, we focus on the problem of stochastic convex optimization (SCO) with either labeled or unlabeled public data. For complete/labeled public data, we show that any $(\epsilon,\delta)$-PA-DP has excess risk $\tilde{\Omega}\big(\min\big\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n_{\text{pub}}}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n\epsilon} \big\} \big)$, where $d$ is the dimension, ${n_{\text{pub}}}$ is the number of public samples, ${n_{\text{priv}}}$ is the number of private samples, and $n={n_{\text{pub}}}+{n_{\text{priv}}}$. These lower bounds are established via our new lower bounds for PA-DP mean estimation, which are of a similar form. Up to constant factors, these lower bounds show that the simple strategy of either treating all data as private or discarding the private data, is optimal. We also study PA-DP supervised learning with \textit{unlabeled} public samples. In contrast to our previous result, we here show novel methods for leveraging public data in private supervised learning. For generalized linear models (GLM) with unlabeled public data, we show an efficient algorithm which, given $\tilde{O}({n_{\text{priv}}}\epsilon)$ unlabeled public samples, achieves the dimension independent rate $\tilde{O}\big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{{n_{\text{priv}}}}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{{n_{\text{priv}}}\epsilon}}\big)$. We develop new lower bounds for this setting which shows that this rate cannot be improved with more public samples, and any fewer public samples leads to a worse rate. Finally, we provide extensions of this result to general hypothesis classes with finite fat-shattering dimension with applications to neural networks and non-Euclidean geometries.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression with distribution shift, the paper claims that public data never provides complementary value: either public data alone suffices, or (for large shifts) private data a...

  2. Synthetic Tabular Data: Methods, Attacks and Defenses

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of tabular synthetic data generation, privacy attacks, and defenses, whose central message is that synthetic data alone does not guarantee privacy.

Pith tools