Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Error

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04746 v1 pith:FODA646Q submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmstooltoolslearningerrortrialbeenexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tools are essential for large language models (LLMs) to acquire up-to-date information and take consequential actions in external environments. Existing work on tool-augmented LLMs primarily focuses on the broad coverage of tools and the flexibility of adding new tools. However, a critical aspect that has surprisingly been understudied is simply how accurately an LLM uses tools for which it has been trained. We find that existing LLMs, including GPT-4 and open-source LLMs specifically fine-tuned for tool use, only reach a correctness rate in the range of 30% to 60%, far from reliable use in practice. We propose a biologically inspired method for tool-augmented LLMs, simulated trial and error (STE), that orchestrates three key mechanisms for successful tool use behaviors in the biological system: trial and error, imagination, and memory. Specifically, STE leverages an LLM's 'imagination' to simulate plausible scenarios for using a tool, after which the LLM interacts with the tool to learn from its execution feedback. Both short-term and long-term memory are employed to improve the depth and breadth of the exploration, respectively. Comprehensive experiments on ToolBench show that STE substantially improves tool learning for LLMs under both in-context learning and fine-tuning settings, bringing a boost of 46.7% to Mistral-Instruct-7B and enabling it to outperform GPT-4. We also show effective continual learning of tools via a simple experience replay strategy.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMAT-1M: A Large Reasoning Dataset for Multimodal Agent Tuning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new one-million-sample multimodal agent tuning dataset with GPT-4o-generated rationales, reflection, and tool/RAG calls is shown to improve fine-tuned models, though training/eval benchmark overlap is not addressed.

  2. The Curious Language Model: Strategic Test-Time Information Acquisition

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CuriosiTree is a greedy tree-search policy that lets LLMs select cost-effective information-gathering actions at test time, outperforming baselines in a simulated clinical diagnosis environment.

Pith tools