REVIEW 1 cited by
WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-off
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Watermarking is a technical means to dissuade malfeasant usage of Large Language Models. This paper proposes a novel watermarking scheme, so-called WaterMax, that enjoys high detectability while sustaining the quality of the generated text of the original LLM. Its new design leaves the LLM untouched (no modification of the weights, logits, temperature, or sampling technique). WaterMax balances robustness and complexity contrary to the watermarking techniques of the literature inherently provoking a trade-off between quality and robustness. Its performance is both theoretically proven and experimentally validated. It outperforms all the SotA techniques under the most complete benchmark suite. Code available at https://github.com/eva-giboulot/WaterMax.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MUSE: Model-Agnostic Tabular Watermarking via Multi-Sample Selection
MUSE embeds a watermark in tabular synthetic data by selecting, among several generated candidate rows, the one with the highest keyed hash score, enabling detection without model inversion.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.