Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PEEB: Part-based Image Classifiers with an Explainable and Editable Language Bottleneck

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.05297 v3 pith:Q56DN2PQ submitted 2024-03-08 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords classpeebclassifiersdescriptorsnamestextaccuracybottleneck
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

CLIP-based classifiers rely on the prompt containing a {class name} that is known to the text encoder. Therefore, they perform poorly on new classes or the classes whose names rarely appear on the Internet (e.g., scientific names of birds). For fine-grained classification, we propose PEEB - an explainable and editable classifier to (1) express the class name into a set of text descriptors that describe the visual parts of that class; and (2) match the embeddings of the detected parts to their textual descriptors in each class to compute a logit score for classification. In a zero-shot setting where the class names are unknown, PEEB outperforms CLIP by a huge margin (~10x in top-1 accuracy). Compared to part-based classifiers, PEEB is not only the state-of-the-art (SOTA) on the supervised-learning setting (88.80% and 92.20% accuracy on CUB-200 and Dogs-120, respectively) but also the first to enable users to edit the text descriptors to form a new classifier without any re-training. Compared to concept bottleneck models, PEEB is also the SOTA in both zero-shot and supervised-learning settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey on the Risks and Limitations of Concept-based Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey cataloging the main vulnerabilities of supervised and unsupervised concept-based models, including concept leakage, spurious correlations, and intervention failures.

Pith tools