Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Elephants Never Forget: Testing Language Models for Memorization of Tabular Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.06644 v1 pith:LPNSYHKK submitted 2024-03-11 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords datallmsmemorizationtaskstestslanguagetabularcontamination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While many have shown how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be applied to a diverse set of tasks, the critical issues of data contamination and memorization are often glossed over. In this work, we address this concern for tabular data. Starting with simple qualitative tests for whether an LLM knows the names and values of features, we introduce a variety of different techniques to assess the degrees of contamination, including statistical tests for conditional distribution modeling and four tests that identify memorization. Our investigation reveals that LLMs are pre-trained on many popular tabular datasets. This exposure can lead to invalid performance evaluation on downstream tasks because the LLMs have, in effect, been fit to the test set. Interestingly, we also identify a regime where the language model reproduces important statistics of the data, but fails to reproduce the dataset verbatim. On these datasets, although seen during training, good performance on downstream tasks might not be due to overfitting. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring data integrity in machine learning tasks with LLMs. To facilitate future research, we release an open-source tool that can perform various tests for memorization \url{https://github.com/interpretml/LLM-Tabular-Memorization-Checker}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Establishing Trustworthy LLM Evaluation via Shortcut Neuron Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Shortcut neuron patching suppresses benchmark-contamination shortcuts in LLMs and yields evaluation scores that strongly correlate with the external MixEval benchmark.

  2. Training an LLM-as-a-Judge Model: Pipeline, Insights, and Practical Lessons

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned 14B LLM judge, trained with scenario-based prompts and controlled instruction generation, approaches GPT-4's human-agreement performance, and the paper documents why scaling distillation data can fail.

  3. FAA Framework: A Large Language Model-Based Approach for Credit Card Fraud Investigations

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The FAA framework automates credit card fraud investigations with GPT-4o agents and reports 98-99% fraud-detection F1, though the evaluation is weakened by self-referential LLM scoring.

Pith tools