REVIEW 3 cited by
What Was Your Prompt? A Remote Keylogging Attack on AI Assistants
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
AI assistants are becoming an integral part of society, used for asking advice or help in personal and confidential issues. In this paper, we unveil a novel side-channel that can be used to read encrypted responses from AI Assistants over the web: the token-length side-channel. We found that many vendors, including OpenAI and Microsoft, have this side-channel. However, inferring the content of a response from a token-length sequence alone proves challenging. This is because tokens are akin to words, and responses can be several sentences long leading to millions of grammatically correct sentences. In this paper, we show how this can be overcome by (1) utilizing the power of a large language model (LLM) to translate these sequences, (2) providing the LLM with inter-sentence context to narrow the search space and (3) performing a known-plaintext attack by fine-tuning the model on the target model's writing style. Using these methods, we were able to accurately reconstruct 29\% of an AI assistant's responses and successfully infer the topic from 55\% of them. To demonstrate the threat, we performed the attack on OpenAI's ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft's Copilot on both browser and API traffic.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Spill The Beans: Exploiting CPU Cache Side-Channels to Leak Tokens from Large Language Models
The paper claims a Flush+Reload attack on the LLM embedding layer can leak 80-90% of API keys and 40% of English output tokens in a single shot.
-
Towards Action Hijacking of Large Language Model-based Agent
A RAG-based LLM application can be induced to assemble harmful SQL, code, or medical action plans from knowledge already stored in its database, with the user prompt itself carrying no forbidden words.
-
InputSnatch: Stealing Input in LLM Services via Timing Side-Channel Attacks
A timing side-channel on shared LLM caches can partially reconstruct private user inputs in prompt-engineering and RAG services.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.