Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Large Language Models Solve Robot Routing?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.10795 v2 pith:2GT2QA4J submitted 2024-03-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords robotroutingproblemslanguagellmsoptimalityratesself-debugging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Routing problems are common in mobile robotics, encompassing tasks such as inspection, surveillance, and coverage. Depending on the objective and constraints, these problems often reduce to variants of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), with solutions traditionally derived by translating high-level objectives into an optimization formulation and using modern solvers to arrive at a solution. Here, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to replace the entire pipeline from tasks described in natural language to the generation of robot routes. We systematically investigate the performance of LLMs in robot routing by constructing a dataset with 80 unique robot routing problems across 8 variants in both single and multi-robot settings. We evaluate LLMs through three frameworks: single attempt, self-debugging, and self-debugging with self-verification and various contexts, including mathematical formulations, pseudo-code, and related research papers. Our findings reveal that both self-debugging and self-verification enhance success rates without significantly lowering the optimality gap. We observe context-sensitive behavior - providing mathematical formulations as context decreases the optimality gap but significantly decreases success rates and providing pseudo-code and related research papers as context does not consistently improve success rates or decrease the optimality gap. We identify key challenges and propose future directions to enhance LLM performance in solving robot routing problems. Our source code is available on the project website: https://sites.google.com/view/words-to-routes/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MobilityBench is a 100,000-episode benchmark with a replay sandbox for deterministic evaluation of LLM route-planning agents; current models score well on basic tasks but fail preference-constrained routing.

Pith tools