Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Measuring Diversity in Co-creative Image Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.13826 v1 pith:AAPNUQ47 submitted 2024-03-06 cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG
keywords diversityassessingbeenco-creativecomparegenerativemodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quality and diversity have been proposed as reasonable heuristics for assessing content generated by co-creative systems, but to date there has been little agreement around what constitutes the latter or how to measure it. Proposed approaches for assessing generative models in terms of diversity have limitations in that they compare the model's outputs to a ground truth that in the era of large pre-trained generative models might not be available, or entail an impractical number of computations. We propose an alternative based on entropy of neural network encodings for comparing diversity between sets of images that does not require ground-truth knowledge and is easy to compute. We also compare two pre-trained networks and show how the choice relates to the notion of diversity that we want to evaluate. We conclude with a discussion of the potential applications of these measures for ideation in interactive systems, model evaluation, and more broadly within computational creativity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dialogue with the Machine and Dialogue with the Art World: Evaluating Generative AI for Culturally-Situated Creativity

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A qualitative evaluation method pairing artist-to-expert dialogue with hands-on generative AI experimentation yields culturally situated critiques and design recommendations.

  2. Explore or Converge? Stage-Guided Per-Step Optimization for Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SGPO is a stage-aware RL fine-tuning method for diffusion models that assigns a different optimization objective to each denoising stage, reducing reward hacking and improving quality, diversity, and convergence speed.

Pith tools