Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On the Convergence of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness: Separability from SGDM and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15146 v1 pith:AXLJAR7O submitted 2024-03-22 cs.LG math.OC

On the Convergence of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness: Separability from SGDM and Beyond

classification cs.LG math.OC
keywords convergenceadamratesgdmgradientlowerstochasticbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper aims to clearly distinguish between Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum (SGDM) and Adam in terms of their convergence rates. We demonstrate that Adam achieves a faster convergence compared to SGDM under the condition of non-uniformly bounded smoothness. Our findings reveal that: (1) in deterministic environments, Adam can attain the known lower bound for the convergence rate of deterministic first-order optimizers, whereas the convergence rate of Gradient Descent with Momentum (GDM) has higher order dependence on the initial function value; (2) in stochastic setting, Adam's convergence rate upper bound matches the lower bounds of stochastic first-order optimizers, considering both the initial function value and the final error, whereas there are instances where SGDM fails to converge with any learning rate. These insights distinctly differentiate Adam and SGDM regarding their convergence rates. Additionally, by introducing a novel stopping-time based technique, we further prove that if we consider the minimum gradient norm during iterations, the corresponding convergence rate can match the lower bounds across all problem hyperparameters. The technique can also help proving that Adam with a specific hyperparameter scheduler is parameter-agnostic, which hence can be of independent interest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Adam Can Beat SGD: Second-Moment Normalization Yields Sharper Tails

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Adam attains a δ^{-1/2} high-probability rate while any SGD guarantee must incur at least δ^{-1} dependence.

  2. Why Adam Can Beat SGD: Second-Moment Normalization Yields Sharper Tails

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Adam achieves a δ^{-1/2} high-probability convergence rate while SGD requires at least δ^{-1} due to second-moment normalization, established via stopping-time/martingale analysis under bounded variance.

  3. Convergence of difference inclusions via a diameter criterion

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A diameter criterion tied to a potential function certifies convergence of difference inclusions, enabling discrete proofs for first-order optimization methods with diminishing steps.