Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

TwoStep: Multi-agent Task Planning using Classical Planners and Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17246 v2 pith:SESIY7WG submitted 2024-03-25 cs.AI cs.CLcs.MAcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.MAcs.RO
keywords planningclassicalexecutiongoalmulti-agentpddlactionhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classical planning formulations like the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) admit action sequences guaranteed to achieve a goal state given an initial state if any are possible. However, reasoning problems defined in PDDL do not capture temporal aspects of action taking, such as concurrent actions between two agents when there are no conflicting conditions, without significant modification and definition to existing PDDL domains. A human expert aware of such constraints can decompose a goal into subgoals, each reachable through single agent planning, to take advantage of simultaneous actions. In contrast to classical planning, large language models (LLMs) directly used for inferring plan steps rarely guarantee execution success, but are capable of leveraging commonsense reasoning to assemble action sequences. We combine the strengths of both classical planning and LLMs by approximating human intuitions for multi-agent planning goal decomposition. We demonstrate that LLM-based goal decomposition leads to faster planning times than solving multi-agent PDDL problems directly while simultaneously achieving fewer plan execution steps than a single agent plan alone, as well as most multiagent plans, while guaranteeing execution success. Additionally, we find that LLM-based approximations of subgoals result in similar multi-agent execution lengths to those specified by human experts. Website and resources at https://glamor-usc.github.io/twostep

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mosaic: Runtime-Efficient Multi-Agent Embodied Planning

    cs.MA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mosaic delivers 27-32% faster multi-agent embodied execution and 4-10 point higher success via agent-centric relative memory plus per-step ILP action allocation.

  2. IndoorR2X: Indoor Robot-to-Everything Coordination with LLM-Driven Planning

    cs.RO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fusing IoT/CCTV into a shared semantic state lets LLM multi-robot planners keep high success while cutting path length, actions, and tokens versus robot-only sharing under partial observability.

  3. From Multi-Agent Systems and the Semantic Web to Agentic AI: A Unified Narrative of the Web of Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper organizes Multi-Agent Systems, the Semantic Web, and LLM-based agents into one narrative in which the location of semantic effort migrated from platform, to data, to model.

  4. HiBerNAC: Hierarchical Brain-emulated Robotic Neural Agent Collective for Disentangling Complex Manipulation

    cs.RO 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HiBerNAC, a multi-agent 'brain-inspired' planner layered on a reactive VLA, is claimed to cut long-horizon task time by 23% and reach 12-31% success where VLA baselines fail, but the supporting data are inconsistent.

Pith tools