REVIEW 2 cited by
Retrieval-enhanced Knowledge Editing in Language Models for Multi-Hop Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown proficiency in question-answering tasks but often struggle to integrate real-time knowledge, leading to potentially outdated or inaccurate responses. This problem becomes even more challenging when dealing with multi-hop questions, since they require LLMs to update and integrate multiple knowledge pieces relevant to the questions. To tackle the problem, we propose the Retrieval-Augmented model Editing (RAE) framework for multi-hop question answering. RAE first retrieves edited facts and then refines the language model through in-context learning. Specifically, our retrieval approach, based on mutual information maximization, leverages the reasoning abilities of LLMs to identify chain facts that traditional similarity-based searches might miss. In addition, our framework includes a pruning strategy to eliminate redundant information from the retrieved facts, which enhances the editing accuracy and mitigates the hallucination problem. Our framework is supported by theoretical justification for its fact retrieval efficacy. Finally, comprehensive evaluation across various LLMs validates RAE's ability in providing accurate answers with updated knowledge. Our code is available at: https://github.com/sycny/RAE.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thought
EditCoT edits a language model's chain-of-thought to inject new knowledge, using a trained CoT editor and iterative conflict detection, and reports competitive results across three benchmarks.
-
GraphICL: Unlocking Graph Learning Potential in LLMs through Structured Prompt Design
A 55-template prompt benchmark showing general LLMs can beat specialized graph LLMs and GNNs on node classification and link prediction, though the reported margins are inflated by test-set prompt selection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.