Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LawInstruct: A Resource for Studying Language Model Adaptation to the Legal Domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.02127 v2 pith:JVQEIFZC submitted 2024-04-02 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords legalinstructionlawinstructtuningacrossdatasetsdomainmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction tuning is an important step in making language models useful for direct user interaction. However, the legal domain is underrepresented in typical instruction datasets (e.g., only 10 out of 1600+ tasks in Super-NaturalInstructions). To study whether instruction tuning on legal datasets is necessary for strong legal reasoning, we aggregate 58 annotated legal datasets and write instructions for each, creating LawInstruct. LawInstruct covers 17 global jurisdictions, 24 languages and a total of 12M examples across diverse tasks such as legal QA, summarization of court cases, and legal argument mining. We evaluate our models on LegalBench, measuring legal reasoning across five categories in 162 challenging and realistic legal tasks, and MMLU, to measure potential drops in general reasoning capabilities. We find that legal-specific instruction tuning on Flan-T5 - yielding FLawN-T5 - improves performance on LegalBench across all model sizes, with an aggregate increase of 15 points or 50% over Flan-T5 for the base size. No model size shows performance drops in MMLU. We publish LawInstruct as a resource for further study of instruction tuning in the legal domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AIMS.au: A Dataset for the Analysis of Modern Slavery Countermeasures in Corporate Statements

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces AIMS.au, a 5,731-statement, sentence-level annotated dataset for detecting disclosures mandated by Australia's Modern Slavery Act, with benchmarks showing fine-tuned models outperform zero-shot LLMs.

Pith tools