Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.04735 v2 pith:QFXTRW5A submitted 2024-04-06 cs.AI cs.CLcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.MA
keywords mathematicalproblemsmacmcapabilitiescomplexadvancementsgpt-4limitations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent advancements in large language models, such as GPT-4, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing standard queries. Despite these advancements, their performance substantially declines in \textbf{advanced mathematical problems requiring complex, multi-step logical reasoning}. To enhance their inferential capabilities, current research has delved into \textit{prompting engineering}, exemplified by methodologies such as the Tree of Thought and Graph of Thought. Nonetheless, these existing approaches encounter two significant limitations. Firstly, their effectiveness in tackling complex mathematical problems is somewhat constrained. Secondly, the necessity to design distinct prompts for individual problems hampers their generalizability. In response to these limitations, this paper introduces the \textit{Multi-Agent System for conditional Mining} (\textbf{MACM}) prompting method. It not only resolves intricate mathematical problems but also demonstrates strong generalization capabilities across various mathematical contexts. With the assistance of MACM, the accuracy of GPT-4 Turbo on the most challenging level five mathematical problems in the MATH dataset increase from $\mathbf{54.68\%} \text{ to } \mathbf{76.73\%}$. The code is available in \url{https://github.com/bin123apple/MACM}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces six-dimension trustworthiness definition and attention-based A-Trust score with a TMS to improve LLM-MAS robustness against malicious or unreliable messages.

  2. Synergizing Logical Reasoning, Knowledge Management and Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM System

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SynergyMAS combines a graph database with a Clingo logic solver, corrective RAG, and Theory of Mind prompts in a hierarchical multi-agent team, demonstrated on a Smart Home Energy Management case study.

  3. From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.AI 2025-04 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.

Pith tools