REVIEW 2 cited by
Dense Training, Sparse Inference: Rethinking Training of Mixture-of-Experts Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models can reduce computational costs by 2-4$\times$ compared to dense models without sacrificing performance, making them more efficient in computation-bounded scenarios. However, MoE models generally require 2-4$\times$ times more parameters to achieve comparable performance to a dense model, which incurs larger GPU memory requirements and makes MoE models less efficient in I/O-bounded scenarios like autoregressive generation. In this work, we propose a hybrid dense training and sparse inference framework for MoE models (DS-MoE) which achieves strong computation and parameter efficiency by employing dense computation across all experts during training and sparse computation during inference. Our experiments on training LLMs demonstrate that our DS-MoE models are more parameter-efficient than standard sparse MoEs and are on par with dense models in terms of total parameter size and performance while being computationally cheaper (activating 30-40% of the model's parameters). Performance tests using vLLM show that our DS-MoE-6B model runs up to $1.86\times$ faster than similar dense models like Mistral-7B, and between $1.50\times$ and $1.71\times$ faster than comparable MoEs, such as DeepSeekMoE-16B and Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Universal Pansharpening Model
A single pansharpening model works across 4-, 7-, 8-, and 10-band satellite images by projecting arbitrary-band MS data into a fixed latent space and fusing with PAN via a latent diffusion bridge.
-
Industrial brain: a human-like autonomous neuro-symbolic cognitive decision-making system
The paper presents an 'industrial brain' framework for supply-chain resilience prediction, but the reported improvements are not supported by the paper's own inconsistent tables and missing baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.