Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Elephants Never Forget: Memorization and Learning of Tabular Data in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.06209 v3 pith:7IF7AMXO submitted 2024-04-09 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsdatasetslearningtabulardataduringmemorizationperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While many have shown how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be applied to a diverse set of tasks, the critical issues of data contamination and memorization are often glossed over. In this work, we address this concern for tabular data. Specifically, we introduce a variety of different techniques to assess whether a language model has seen a tabular dataset during training. This investigation reveals that LLMs have memorized many popular tabular datasets verbatim. We then compare the few-shot learning performance of LLMs on datasets that were seen during training to the performance on datasets released after training. We find that LLMs perform better on datasets seen during training, indicating that memorization leads to overfitting. At the same time, LLMs show non-trivial performance on novel datasets and are surprisingly robust to data transformations. We then investigate the in-context statistical learning abilities of LLMs. While LLMs are significantly better than random at solving statistical classification problems, the sample efficiency of few-shot learning lags behind traditional statistical learning algorithms, especially as the dimension of the problem increases. This suggests that much of the observed few-shot performance on novel real-world datasets is due to the LLM's world knowledge. Overall, our results highlight the importance of testing whether an LLM has seen an evaluation dataset during pre-training. We release the https://github.com/interpretml/LLM-Tabular-Memorization-Checker Python package to test LLMs for memorization of tabular datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TabReason: A Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Reasoning LLM for Explainable Tabular Data Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Applying GRPO reinforcement learning with format and accuracy rewards to a 1.5B LLM yields high weighted F1 on financial tabular benchmarks, but near-zero MCC on imbalanced datasets and unvalidated explanations.

Pith tools