Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07020 v2 pith:4Q3W4Q4C submitted 2024-04-10 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Looking for Signs of Discreteness in the Gravitational-wave Background

Gabriella Agazie , Akash Anumarlapudi , Anne M. Archibald , Zaven Arzoumanian , Jeremy George Baier , Paul T. Baker , Bence B\'ecsy , Laura Blecha
show 92 more authors
Adam Brazier Paul R. Brook Lucas Brown Sarah Burke-Spolaor J. Andrew Casey-Clyde Maria Charisi Shami Chatterjee Tyler Cohen James M. Cordes Neil J. Cornish Fronefield Crawford H. Thankful Cromartie Kathryn Crowter Megan E. DeCesar Paul B. Demorest Heling Deng Timothy Dolch Elizabeth C. Ferrara William Fiore Emmanuel Fonseca Gabriel E. Freedman Nate Garver-Daniels Peter A. Gentile Joseph Glaser Deborah C. Good Kayhan G\"ultekin Jeffrey S. Hazboun Ross J. Jennings Aaron D. Johnson Megan L. Jones Andrew R. Kaiser David L. Kaplan Luke Zoltan Kelley Matthew Kerr Joey S. Key Nima Laal Michael T. Lam William G. Lamb Bjorn Larsen T. Joseph W. Lazio Natalia Lewandowska Tingting Liu Duncan R. Lorimer Jing Luo Ryan S. Lynch Chung-Pei Ma Dustin R. Madison Alexander McEwen James W. McKee Maura A. McLaughlin Natasha McMann Bradley W. Meyers Patrick M. Meyers Chiara M. F. Mingarelli Andrea Mitridate Priyamvada Natarajan Cherry Ng David J. Nice Stella Koch Ocker Ken D. Olum Timothy T. Pennucci Benetge B. P. Perera Nihan S. Pol Henri A. Radovan Scott M. Ransom Paul S. Ray Joseph D. Romano Jessie C. Runnoe Shashwat C. Sardesai Ann Schmiedekamp Carl Schmiedekamp Kai Schmitz Brent Shapiro-Albert Xavier Siemens Joseph Simon Magdalena S. Siwek Sophia V. Sosa Fiscella Ingrid H. Stairs Daniel R. Stinebring Kevin Stovall Abhimanyu Susobhanan Joseph K. Swiggum Stephen R. Taylor Jacob E. Turner Caner Unal Michele Vallisneri Sarah J. Vigeland Haley M. Wahl London Willson Caitlin A. Witt David Wright Olivia Young
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords mathrmsigmasmbhbsbackgroundexpectednanogravrealizationsspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The cosmic merger history of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) is expected to produce a low-frequency gravitational wave background (GWB). Here we investigate how signs of the discrete nature of this GWB can manifest in pulsar timing arrays through excursions from, and breaks in, the expected $f_{\mathrm{GW}}^{-2/3}$ power-law of the GWB strain spectrum. To do this, we create a semi-analytic SMBHB population model, fit to NANOGrav's 15 yr GWB amplitude, and with 1,000 realizations we study the populations' characteristic strain and residual spectra. Comparing our models to the NANOGrav 15 yr spectrum, we find two interesting excursions from the power-law. The first, at $2 \; \mathrm{nHz}$, is below our GWB realizations with $p$-value significance $p = 0.05$ to $0.06$ ($\approx 1.8 \sigma - 1.9 \sigma$). The second, at $16 \; \mathrm{nHz}$, is above our GWB realizations with $p = 0.04$ to $0.15$ ($\approx 1.4 \sigma - 2.1 \sigma$). We explore the properties of a loud SMBHB which could cause such an excursion. Our simulations also show that the expected number of SMBHBs decreases by three orders of magnitude, from $\sim 10^6$ to $\sim 10^3$, between $2\; \mathrm{nHz}$ and $20 \; \mathrm{nHz}$. This causes a break in the strain spectrum as the stochasticity of the background breaks down at $26^{+28}_{-19} \; \mathrm{nHz}$, consistent with predictions pre-dating GWB measurements. The diminished GWB signal from SMBHBs at frequencies above the $26~\mathrm{nHz}$ break opens a window for PTAs to detect continuous GWs from individual SMBHBs or GWs from the early universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravity Echoes from Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Future microhertz detections combined with nanohertz pulsar terms can serve as gravity echoes to measure supermassive black hole binary inspiral rates from hundreds to thousands of years in the past.

  2. Population statistics of nanohertz gravitational wave sources

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hierarchical Bayesian inference framework combining free-spectrum reconstruction with population-level likelihoods distinguishes finite SMBHB populations from Gaussian primordial GWB using mock PTA data.

  3. Higher-order statistics of the stochastic gravitational wave background from supermassive black hole binaries

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    With a physically motivated z_min cutoff, higher-order moments of the SGWB from SMBH binaries depend on the mass function solely via <M^{10/3}>, giving a variance-to-mean ratio for <M^{10/3}>/<M^{5/3}> and a kurtosis-...

  4. Testing General Relativity with Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed to test beyond-GR effects in nanohertz continuous waves from individual SMBHBs, deriving modified inter-pulsar correlations, antenna responses, and phase delays for three deviation classes, va...

  5. Are PTA measurements sensitive to gravitational wave non-Gaussianities?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PTA statistical tests cannot distinguish Gaussian and non-Gaussian GWB amplitude distributions in a model-agnostic way after decorrelation.

  6. Are PTA measurements sensitive to gravitational wave non-Gaussianities?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PTA statistical tests lose sensitivity to non-Gaussian GW features after decorrelation and cannot distinguish them model-agnostically.

  7. The Heavy Tailed Non-Gaussianity of the Supermassive Black Hole Gravitational Wave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The gravitational wave background from supermassive black hole binaries has a universal heavy-tailed amplitude distribution with power-law index -4, causing divergent higher moments and dominance of the strongest sign...