Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge and Concept at Different Layers?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07066 v7 pith:5M5YE5FI submitted 2024-04-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords layerstasksconceptllmsmodelsconceptsdeeperunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks. However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that LLMs process concepts of varying complexities in different layers, introducing the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers. Specifically, we categorize concepts based on their level of abstraction, defining them in the order of increasing complexity within factual, emotional, and inferential tasks. We conduct extensive probing experiments using layer-wise representations across various LLM families (Gemma, LLaMA, Qwen) on various datasets spanning the three domains of tasks. Our findings reveal that models could efficiently conduct probing for simpler tasks in shallow layers, and more complex tasks typically necessitate deeper layers for accurate understanding. Additionally, we examine how external factors, such as adding noise to the input and quantizing the model weights, might affect layer-wise representations. Our findings suggest that these factors can impede the development of a conceptual understanding of LLMs until deeper layers are explored. We hope that our proposed concept and experimental insights will enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying LLMs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Luckfort/CD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Birth of Knowledge: Emergent Features across Time, Space, and Scale in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder probes of Pythia models show concept activations jump at roughly 410M parameters and during mid-training, while early-layer features re-emerge at the output layer.

  2. Crown, Frame, Reverse: Layer-Wise Scaling Variants for LLM Pre-Training

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 180M parameters and 5B tokens, all layer-wise scaling variants beat the paper's 18-layer uniform baseline, yet the 12-layer uniform baseline remains best.

  3. SATORI: Static Test Oracle Generation for REST APIs

    cs.SE 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SATORI statically infers REST API test oracles from OpenAPI specs via LLMs, reporting F1 74.3%, above AGORA+'s 69.3%, with 18 confirmed bugs; the supplied full text, however, is a different paper.

  4. Void in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A non-trainable L2-norm thresholding method detects "void" layers in instruction-tuned LLMs, and skipping these layers sometimes improves accuracy while reducing layer usage.

Pith tools