REVIEW 4 cited by
Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge and Concept at Different Layers?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performances across a wide range of tasks. However, the mechanisms by which these models encode tasks of varying complexities remain poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that LLMs process concepts of varying complexities in different layers, introducing the idea of "Concept Depth" to suggest that more complex concepts are typically acquired in deeper layers. Specifically, we categorize concepts based on their level of abstraction, defining them in the order of increasing complexity within factual, emotional, and inferential tasks. We conduct extensive probing experiments using layer-wise representations across various LLM families (Gemma, LLaMA, Qwen) on various datasets spanning the three domains of tasks. Our findings reveal that models could efficiently conduct probing for simpler tasks in shallow layers, and more complex tasks typically necessitate deeper layers for accurate understanding. Additionally, we examine how external factors, such as adding noise to the input and quantizing the model weights, might affect layer-wise representations. Our findings suggest that these factors can impede the development of a conceptual understanding of LLMs until deeper layers are explored. We hope that our proposed concept and experimental insights will enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying LLMs. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Luckfort/CD.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Birth of Knowledge: Emergent Features across Time, Space, and Scale in Large Language Models
Sparse autoencoder probes of Pythia models show concept activations jump at roughly 410M parameters and during mid-training, while early-layer features re-emerge at the output layer.
-
Crown, Frame, Reverse: Layer-Wise Scaling Variants for LLM Pre-Training
At 180M parameters and 5B tokens, all layer-wise scaling variants beat the paper's 18-layer uniform baseline, yet the 12-layer uniform baseline remains best.
-
SATORI: Static Test Oracle Generation for REST APIs
SATORI statically infers REST API test oracles from OpenAPI specs via LLMs, reporting F1 74.3%, above AGORA+'s 69.3%, with 18 confirmed bugs; the supplied full text, however, is a different paper.
-
Void in Language Models
A non-trainable L2-norm thresholding method detects "void" layers in instruction-tuned LLMs, and skipping these layers sometimes improves accuracy while reducing layer usage.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.