Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-aided explanations of EDA synthesis errors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07235 v2 pith:YF4WCABO submitted 2024-04-07 cs.AR cs.AIcs.PLcs.SE

classification cs.ARcs.AIcs.PLcs.SE
keywords explanationsllmsusedchallengecomplexdesignerrorgenerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training new engineers in digital design is a challenge, particularly when it comes to teaching the complex electronic design automation (EDA) tooling used in this domain. Learners will typically deploy designs in the Verilog and VHDL hardware description languages to Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) from Altera (Intel) and Xilinx (AMD) via proprietary closed-source toolchains (Quartus Prime and Vivado, respectively). These tools are complex and difficult to use -- yet, as they are the tools used in industry, they are an essential first step in this space. In this work, we examine how recent advances in artificial intelligence may be leveraged to address aspects of this challenge. Specifically, we investigate if Large Language Models (LLMs), which have demonstrated text comprehension and question-answering capabilities, can be used to generate novice-friendly explanations of compile-time synthesis error messages from Quartus Prime and Vivado. To perform this study we generate 936 error message explanations using three OpenAI LLMs over 21 different buggy code samples. These are then graded for relevance and correctness, and we find that in approximately 71% of cases the LLMs give correct & complete explanations suitable for novice learners.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HLSDebugger: Identification and Correction of Logic Bugs in HLS Code with LLM Solutions

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HLSDebugger fixes logic bugs in HLS code with 37.6% accuracy, outperforming GPT-4 by over 3x, using an encoder-decoder model trained on a new 300K-sample dataset.

  2. VeriOpt: PPA-Aware High-Quality Verilog Generation via Multi-Role LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-role LLM prompting framework with PPA-aware in-context learning reports 25/29 functional correctness on RTLLM and up to 88% power, 76% area, and 73% timing gains over its own baseline.

Pith tools