REVIEW 5 cited by
Constructing Benchmarks and Interventions for Combating Hallucinations in LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Constructing Benchmarks and Interventions for Combating Hallucinations in LLMs
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, which sparked a widespread effort to detect and prevent them. Recent work attempts to mitigate hallucinations by intervening in the model's generation, typically computing representative vectors of hallucinations vs. grounded generations, for steering the model's hidden states away from a hallucinatory state. However, common studies employ different setups and do not properly separate different possible causes of hallucinations, making interventions misguided. In this work, we introduce a method for categorizing examples based on the model's prior knowledge, named WACK. We construct WACK benchmarks that support interventions in two settings: open-book and closed-book question answering. Using the benchmarks, we perform an extensive investigation of the effect of different choices for intervention, such as the intervened components, and how often and how strongly to intervene. We find that intervention success varies depending on the component, with the attention blocks performing well and the residual stream proving detrimental to language modeling capabilities. We also show that interventions can benefit from representative vectors collected before, rather than after, a hallucination occurs. Finally, we introduce a new dynamic intervention, which intervenes only if needed, and thus is more robust than standard static interventions. The code is available at https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/hallucination-mitigation .
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Boosting Self-Consistency with Ranking
RISC reformulates self-consistency answer selection as a ranking task solved by a lightweight LambdaRank model with five hand-designed features, yielding better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs than majority voting on Q...
-
Neural Message-Passing on Attention Graphs for Hallucination Detection
CHARM trains graph neural networks on token-attention graphs built from LLM computational traces and outperforms prior hallucination detectors on five benchmarks at token and response level.
-
Towards Dependable Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Factual Confidence Prediction
A conformal prediction filter for retrieval chunks plus an attention-based factuality classifier can raise RAG answer quality by up to 6% and detect inconsistent generations up to 77% of the time.
-
RPO-PDT: Demonstrating Role-Play-Based Knowledge Adaptation for Student Support Dialogue (Demonstration System)
RPO-PDT demonstrates a role-play-based, retrieval-grounded system for adaptive, policy-constrained student support dialogue with reverse-roleplay for strategy memory.
-
Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models through Region-Aware Attention Recalibration
A training-free region-aware attention recalibration strategy reduces object hallucinations in LVLMs on CHAIR, POPE, and MME benchmarks while preserving fluency.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.