REVIEW 2 cited by
LLMem: Estimating GPU Memory Usage for Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) with limited hardware presents challenges due to GPU memory constraints. Various distributed fine-tuning methods have been proposed to alleviate memory constraints on GPU. However, determining the most effective method for achieving rapid fine-tuning while preventing GPU out-of-memory issues in a given environment remains unclear. To address this challenge, we introduce LLMem, a solution that estimates the GPU memory consumption when applying distributed fine-tuning methods across multiple GPUs and identifies the optimal method. We conduct GPU memory usage estimation prior to fine-tuning, leveraging the fundamental structure of transformer-based decoder models and the memory usage distribution of each method. Experimental results show that LLMem accurately estimates peak GPU memory usage on a single GPU, with error rates of up to 1.6%. Additionally, it shows an average error rate of 3.0% when applying distributed fine-tuning methods to LLMs with more than a billion parameters on multi-GPU setups.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FastTPS: An Optimized Method for LLM Token Phase for AI accelerators
FastTPS accelerates LLM token-phase inference via reloading-free static KV-cache management, tiled fused RoPE attention, and interlaced-weight MLP fusion, yielding up to 6× speedup at 93% bandwidth on AMD NPUs.
-
A Survey of End-to-End Modeling for Distributed DNN Training: Workloads, Simulators, and TCO
This survey classifies distributed DNN training simulators into analytical, profiling-based, and execution-driven categories, and compares them alongside TCO and carbon-emission models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.