Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SIMPLOT: Enhancing Chart Question Answering by Distilling Essentials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00021 v3 pith:ZDBCZORL submitted 2024-02-22 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningchartchartsmodelmethodsimplottableaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, interpreting complex charts with logical reasoning has emerged as challenges due to the development of vision-language models. A prior state-of-the-art (SOTA) model has presented an end-to-end method that leverages the vision-language model to convert charts into table format utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) for reasoning. However, unlike natural images, charts contain a mix of essential and irrelevant information required for chart reasoning, and we discover that this characteristic can lower the performance of chart-to-table extraction. In this paper, we introduce SIMPLOT, a method designed to extract only the elements necessary for chart reasoning. The proposed method involves two steps: 1) training to mimic a simple plot that contains only the essential information from a complex chart for table extraction, followed by 2) performing reasoning based on the table. Our model enables accurate chart reasoning without the need for additional annotations or datasets, and its effectiveness is demonstrated through various experiments. Furthermore, we propose a novel prompt mimicking how human interpret charts for more accurate reasoning. Our source code is available at https://github.com/sangwu99/Simplot.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Does It Run and Is That Enough? Revisiting Text-to-Chart Generation with a Multi-Agent Approach

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A draft-and-repair agentic loop using GPT-4o-mini reduces text-to-chart execution errors to 4.5-4.6% on two benchmarks, suggesting execution is nearly solved and future work should focus on quality and accessibility.

Pith tools