Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00711 v2 pith:MW4W3JRL submitted 2024-04-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords faigcartificialmethodscontentgenerativeintelligencemodelsaigc
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, generative artificial intelligence models, represented by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion Models (DMs), have revolutionized content production methods. These artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) have become deeply embedded in various aspects of daily life and work. However, these technologies have also led to the emergence of Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (FAIGC), posing new challenges in distinguishing genuine information. It is crucial to recognize that AIGC technology is akin to a double-edged sword; its potent generative capabilities, while beneficial, also pose risks for the creation and dissemination of FAIGC. In this survey, We propose a new taxonomy that provides a more comprehensive breakdown of the space of FAIGC methods today. Next, we explore the modalities and generative technologies of FAIGC. We introduce FAIGC detection methods and summarize the related benchmark from various perspectives. Finally, we discuss outstanding challenges and promising areas for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Commenotes: Synthesizing Organic Comments to Support Community-Based Fact-Checking

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A filtering plus LLM synthesis pipeline turns early user comments into community-note-style fact-checks; the best model beats human notes in 70.1% of pairwise user ratings.

Pith tools