Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Simulation-Based Benchmarking of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Personalized Retail Promotions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.10469 v1 pith:G2LEPIFC submitted 2024-05-16 cs.AI cs.LGecon.EMstat.ML

classification cs.AIcs.LGecon.EMstat.ML
keywords agentscustomerretailbenchmarkinglearningdevelopmentoptimizepurchase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of open benchmarking platforms could greatly accelerate the adoption of AI agents in retail. This paper presents comprehensive simulations of customer shopping behaviors for the purpose of benchmarking reinforcement learning (RL) agents that optimize coupon targeting. The difficulty of this learning problem is largely driven by the sparsity of customer purchase events. We trained agents using offline batch data comprising summarized customer purchase histories to help mitigate this effect. Our experiments revealed that contextual bandit and deep RL methods that are less prone to over-fitting the sparse reward distributions significantly outperform static policies. This study offers a practical framework for simulating AI agents that optimize the entire retail customer journey. It aims to inspire the further development of simulation tools for retail AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalable and Interpretable Contextual Bandits: A Literature Review and Retail Offer Prototype

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper reviews contextual bandit methods and sketches a category-level logistic-regression prototype for retail offers with LLM-generated member profiles, but provides no empirical validation.

Pith tools