Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Influence based explainability of brain tumors segmentation in multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12222 v1 pith:W2U6QATD submitted 2024-04-05 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV

Influence based explainability of brain tumors segmentation in multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

classification eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV
keywords segmentationalgorithmexplainabilityproposedclinicalimagingmagneticmedical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a fundamental tool in medical applications. Despite this rapid development, deep neural networks remain black boxes that are difficult to explain, and this represents a major limitation for their use in clinical practice. We focus on the segmentation of medical images task, where most explainability methods proposed so far provide a visual explanation in terms of an input saliency map. The aim of this work is to extend, implement and test instead an influence-based explainability algorithm, TracIn, proposed originally for classification tasks, in a challenging clinical problem, i.e., multiclass segmentation of tumor brains in multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We verify the faithfulness of the proposed algorithm linking the similarities of the latent representation of the network to the TracIn output. We further test the capacity of the algorithm to provide local and global explanations, and we suggest that it can be adopted as a tool to select the most relevant features used in the decision process. The method is generalizable for all semantic segmentation tasks where classes are mutually exclusive, which is the standard framework in these cases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.