Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A survey on fairness of large language models in e-commerce: progress, application, and challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13025 v2 pith:PRUFK4TM submitted 2024-05-15 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords e-commercellmstheyfairnessproductsurveyapplicationschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This survey explores the fairness of large language models (LLMs) in e-commerce, examining their progress, applications, and the challenges they face. LLMs have become pivotal in the e-commerce domain, offering innovative solutions and enhancing customer experiences. This work presents a comprehensive survey on the applications and challenges of LLMs in e-commerce. The paper begins by introducing the key principles underlying the use of LLMs in e-commerce, detailing the processes of pretraining, fine-tuning, and prompting that tailor these models to specific needs. It then explores the varied applications of LLMs in e-commerce, including product reviews, where they synthesize and analyze customer feedback; product recommendations, where they leverage consumer data to suggest relevant items; product information translation, enhancing global accessibility; and product question and answer sections, where they automate customer support. The paper critically addresses the fairness challenges in e-commerce, highlighting how biases in training data and algorithms can lead to unfair outcomes, such as reinforcing stereotypes or discriminating against certain groups. These issues not only undermine consumer trust, but also raise ethical and legal concerns. Finally, the work outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for more equitable and transparent LLMs in e-commerce. It advocates for ongoing efforts to mitigate biases and improve the fairness of these systems, ensuring they serve diverse global markets effectively and ethically. Through this comprehensive analysis, the survey provides a holistic view of the current landscape of LLMs in e-commerce, offering insights into their potential and limitations, and guiding future endeavors in creating fairer and more inclusive e-commerce environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EVADE-Bench: Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating and Enhancing Evasive Content Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 2,833 evasive text samples and 13,961 images shows current LLMs and VLMs frequently miss veiled policy violations in Chinese e-commerce ads.

  2. MindFlow: Revolutionizing E-commerce Customer Support with Multimodal LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An e-commerce support agent built from known LLM components reports 93.53% relative A/B improvement and 62.5% pass^5 ablation gain, but no code or public benchmark is provided.

Pith tools