pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.13869 · v2 · submitted 2024-05-22 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Optically Hyperpolarized Materials for Levitated Optomechanics

Marit O. E. Steiner , Julen S. Pedernales , Martin B. Plenio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords levitated optomechanicshyperpolarized materialspentacene-doped naphthalenematter-wave interferometryStern-Gerlach protocolobjective collapse modelsNMR techniquesnuclear spin polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pentacene-doped naphthalene reaches over 80% bulk nuclear spin polarization with week-long lifetimes, enabling a multi-spin Stern-Gerlach interferometry protocol in levitated particles that avoids limitations of electronic spin defects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores levitating solids that contain optically controllable electron spins to hyperpolarize their nuclear spin environment with exceptionally long lifetimes. Pentacene-doped naphthalene is presented as a prime example that can exceed 80% polarization at cryogenic temperatures with lifetimes over weeks. These properties support a multi-spin Stern-Gerlach-type interferometry protocol that exploits the homogeneous spin distribution and lack of a preferential nuclear-spin quantization axis. The protocol is positioned to sidestep constraints faced by crystals with electronic spin defects such as NV centers in nanodiamonds. The work also examines prospects for high-frequency magic angle spinning in NMR and a position-based method to measure spin polarization.

Core claim

Materials such as pentacene-doped naphthalene can achieve bulk polarization exceeding 80% at cryogenic temperatures with polarization lifetimes extending over weeks. These hyperpolarized solids enable a multi-spin Stern-Gerlach-type interferometry protocol in levitated particles. The homogeneous spin distribution and absence of a preferential nuclear-spin quantization axis allow the protocol to avoid many limitations associated with solid-state crystals hosting electronic spin defects such as nanodiamonds containing NV centers. The paper evaluates the interferometer's capacity to tighten bounds on free parameters of objective collapse models and analyzes noise sources to determine required隔离

What carries the argument

The multi-spin Stern-Gerlach-type interferometry protocol that uses the hyperpolarized nuclear spins in the levitated nanoparticle to generate spin-dependent forces for interference.

If this is right

  • The interferometer can enhance existing bounds on the free parameters of objective collapse models.
  • Magic angle spinning can be implemented at frequencies surpassing current NMR standards by using levitation's rotational capabilities.
  • Spin ensemble polarization can be measured through shifts in the position of the nanoparticle.
  • Dominant noise sources can be benchmarked to establish isolation requirements for the proposed applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same materials could support hybrid protocols that combine interferometry with NMR readout in a single levitated particle.
  • If levitation preserves the reported polarization properties, the approach might extend to testing other collapse models or gravitational effects at mesoscopic scales.
  • The absence of a fixed quantization axis could enable new control sequences in levitated NMR that are inaccessible with mechanically spun samples.

Load-bearing premise

The hyperpolarized material can be stably levitated while preserving homogeneous spin distribution, absence of a preferential nuclear-spin quantization axis, and the isolation levels needed for interferometry and NMR without new dominant decoherence channels.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing that levitation of pentacene-doped naphthalene shortens polarization lifetime below weeks or introduces a dominant preferential quantization axis would falsify the protocol's claimed advantages.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.13869 by Julen S. Pedernales, Marit O. E. Steiner, Martin B. Plenio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) and (b): The structure of an individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Here, the time evolution of the κ wave packets in a magnetic field gradient is displayed. The κ th wave packet oscillates around the equilibrium position xeq,κ, as depicted on the left. After a full period of 2π/Ω, all trajectories meet again in the center of the trap. The equilibrium positions xeq,κ = (2κ − N)χ are spaced by χ. If the initial spin state is given by eq. (17), the wave packets corresponding… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Protocol for rapid expansion and recombina [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DQN n=1 σˆ (n) x E for an arbitrary set of system pa￾rameters and protocol duration. DQN n=1 σˆ (n) x E is greater for even values of N and smaller for odd ones. This dis￾crepancy arises from the fact that for even N, there exists a trajectory κ˜ = N/2 for which κ˜ = N − κ˜ and thus ΛN/2,N/2 = 0, a condition not satisfied for odd N. Moreover, this term carries the greatest weight in the sum of eq. (37). Fo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example for the protocol to test the CSL model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the behavior of ⟨Mˆ ⟩(Ttot)/⟨Mˆ ⟩(0) for the parameters in table 2 a) (upper panel) and table 2 c) (lower panel) and for fixed χ. Due to limited computation times, ⟨Mˆ ⟩(Ttot)/⟨Mˆ ⟩(0) could not be evaluated numerically for N ≈ 108 as required, but only for N < 300. There￾fore, additionally to varying N, χ was varied as this is equivalent to varying the gyromagnetic ratio of the spins. In d… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Exclusion plot of the parameter space of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Here, a spherical nanoparticle with radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An example of the simplest case of the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: There are a0 ν  possibilities to place ν ones in the yellow entries of k ′ and N−a0 κ−ν  possibilities to place κ − ν ones in the green entries. where "1" corresponds to "↑" and "0" corresponds to "↓". By definition, the Dicke state |κ⟩ can be written in the spin basis as vuut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Here, the position distribution of the wave packet after the second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Dependence of the wave-function width on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the potential of levitating solids embedded with non-permanent, optically controllable electron spins, which can be used to hyperpolarize their nuclear spin environment with exceptionally long lifetimes. For example, pentacene-doped naphthalene, which will also serve as our prime example, can achieve bulk polarization exceeding $80\,\%$ at cryogenic temperatures with polarization lifetimes extending over weeks. These materials make a compelling case for applications such as matter-wave interferometry and novel uses of established NMR techniques. In that spirit, we design a multi-spin Stern-Gerlach-type interferometry protocol which, thanks to the homogeneous spin distribution and the absence of a preferential nuclear-spin quantization axis in such materials, avoids many of the limitations associated with solid state crystals hosting electronic spin defects, such as nanodiamonds containing NV centers. We assess the potential of our interferometer to enhance existing bounds on the free parameters of objective collapse models. Beyond matter-wave interferometry, we analyze the prospects for implementing magic angle spinning at frequencies surpassing the current standard in NMR, capitalizing on the exceptional rotational capabilities offered by levitation. Additionally, we outline a novel protocol for measuring spin ensemble polarization via the position of the nanoparticle and conduct an analysis of dominant noise sources, benchmarking the required isolation levels for various applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes optically hyperpolarized materials such as pentacene-doped naphthalene for levitated optomechanics. It claims that bulk nuclear polarization exceeding 80% with lifetimes over weeks at cryogenic temperatures enables a multi-spin Stern-Gerlach-type interferometry protocol that avoids limitations of NV-center systems due to homogeneous spin distribution and absent preferential quantization axis. The work also outlines prospects for high-frequency magic-angle spinning NMR, a position-based polarization measurement protocol, and an analysis of dominant noise sources with required isolation levels for applications including improved bounds on objective collapse models.

Significance. If the claims hold, the proposal could open a new platform for matter-wave interferometry and levitated NMR by combining long-lived hyperpolarization with optical levitation, potentially sidestepping decoherence channels specific to electronic spin defects. The grounding in established material properties (e.g., pentacene-doped naphthalene polarization data from prior literature) is a positive feature, but the absence of derivations, error budgets, or explicit calculations for levitation-specific effects limits immediate significance to exploratory potential.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, final paragraph and noise analysis] Abstract, final paragraph and noise analysis: the claim that the multi-spin Stern-Gerlach protocol avoids NV-center limitations in the levitated case rests on preservation of homogeneous spin distribution, absent quantization axis, and weeks-long polarization lifetime. However, the noise analysis benchmarks isolation levels without explicit calculations or bounds showing that trap-induced channels (surface electric-field fluctuations, residual gas collisions at the relevant particle size, or magnetic gradients from levitation optics) remain below thresholds that would destroy the required coherence or polarization. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Interferometry protocol section] The description of the Stern-Gerlach-type protocol would benefit from a clearer step-by-step outline or schematic, as the current presentation leaves the multi-spin implementation details somewhat implicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the noise analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph and noise analysis] Abstract, final paragraph and noise analysis: the claim that the multi-spin Stern-Gerlach protocol avoids NV-center limitations in the levitated case rests on preservation of homogeneous spin distribution, absent quantization axis, and weeks-long polarization lifetime. However, the noise analysis benchmarks isolation levels without explicit calculations or bounds showing that trap-induced channels (surface electric-field fluctuations, residual gas collisions at the relevant particle size, or magnetic gradients from levitation optics) remain below thresholds that would destroy the required coherence or polarization. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the existing noise analysis provides benchmarks for isolation levels based on dominant sources but lacks explicit calculations for the specific trap-induced channels listed (surface electric-field fluctuations, residual gas collisions at relevant particle sizes, and magnetic gradients from levitation optics). In the revised manuscript we will add these calculations, including order-of-magnitude estimates and bounds, to demonstrate that appropriate isolation can keep the resulting decoherence and polarization loss below the thresholds needed to preserve the homogeneous spin distribution and long lifetimes. This will directly support the central claim that the protocol avoids key NV-center limitations in the levitated setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal relies on external literature values

full rationale

The manuscript is a forward-looking proposal that cites external literature for the key material properties of pentacene-doped naphthalene (polarization >80%, weeks-long lifetimes) and designs protocols around those values. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed performance, interferometer advantages, or required isolation levels to quantities defined by the authors' own prior work. The noise analysis and Stern-Gerlach protocol rest on stated external benchmarks rather than self-referential constructions, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained derivation against external references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all performance estimates are stated without derivation or fitting details.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1245 out tokens · 32544 ms · 2026-05-24T00:34:05.972407+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Angular Momentum Entanglement Mediated By General Relativistic Frame Dragging

    quant-ph 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Frame dragging induces a dipolar coupling that generates entanglement between angular momentum eigenstates of two rotating spherically symmetric masses, with some correlations possible even without initial superpositions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    To- ward quantum-limited position measure- ments using optically levitated micro- spheres

    K. G. Libbrecht and E. D. Black. “To- ward quantum-limited position measure- ments using optically levitated micro- spheres”. Physics Letters A321, 99– 102 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero- Isart. “Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum”. Science374, 168 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure

    A. Ashkin. “Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure”. Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 156–159 (1970)

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Toward quantum superpo- sition of living organisms

    O. Romero-Isart, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, and J. I. Cirac. “Toward quantum superpo- sition of living organisms”. New Journal of Physics12, 033015 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere

    D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J.Ye, O.Painter, H.J.Kimble, and Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.27 P. Zoller. “Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere”. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 1005–1010 (2010)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Cavity cooling of an optically trapped nanoparti- cle

    P. F. Barker and M. N. Shneider. “Cavity cooling of an optically trapped nanoparti- cle”. Phys. Rev. A81, 023826 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Coolingofalevitatednanoparti- cle to the motional quantum ground state

    U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuletić, N. Kiesel, and M. As- pelmeyer. “Coolingofalevitatednanoparti- cle to the motional quantum ground state”. Science367, 892–895 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room tem- perature

    L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. As- pelmeyer. “Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room tem- perature”. Nature595, 373–377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Quantum control of a nanoparticle op- tically levitated in cryogenic free space

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny. “Quantum control of a nanoparticle op- tically levitated in cryogenic free space”. Nature595, 378–382 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Cavity optomechanics

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt. “Cavity optomechanics”. Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391–1452 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Full rotational control of lev- itated silicon nanorods

    S. Kuhn, A. Kosloff, B. A. Stickler, F. Pa- tolsky, K. Hornberger, M. Arndt, and J. Millen. “Full rotational control of lev- itated silicon nanorods”. Optica4, 356– 360 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Quantum rotations ofnanoparticles

    B. A. Stickler, K. Hornberger, and M. S. Kim. “Quantum rotations ofnanoparticles”. Nature Reviews Physics3, 589–597 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Decoherence-free rotational degrees of freedom for quantum applications

    J. S. Pedernales, F. Cosco, and M. B. Ple- nio. “Decoherence-free rotational degrees of freedom for quantum applications”. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 090501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Ghz rotation of an optically trapped nanopar- ticle in vacuum

    R. Reimann, M. Doderer, E. Hebe- streit, R. Diehl, M. Frimmer, D. Windey, F. Tebbenjohanns, and L. Novotny. “Ghz rotation of an optically trapped nanopar- ticle in vacuum”. Physical Review Letters 121, 033602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Op- tically levitated nanodumbbell torsion bal- ance and ghz nanomechanical rotor

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, Y.-H. Deng, T. M. Hoang, Q. Han, R.-M. Ma, and T. Li. “Op- tically levitated nanodumbbell torsion bal- ance and ghz nanomechanical rotor”. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 033603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Ultrasensitive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, P. Ju, X. Gao, and T. Li. “Ultrasensitive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor”. Nature Nanotechnology15, 89–93 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Multi-dimensional single-spin nano-optomechanics with a levitated nanodiamond

    L. P. Neukirch, E. von Haartman, J. M. Rosenholm, and A. Nick Vami- vakas. “Multi-dimensional single-spin nano-optomechanics with a levitated nanodiamond”. Nature Photonics9, 653–657 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Electron spin control of optically levitated nanodiamonds in vacuum

    T. M. Hoang, J. Ahn, J. Bang, and T. Li. “Electron spin control of optically levitated nanodiamonds in vacuum”. Nature Com- munications7, 12250 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Motion control and op- tical interrogation of a levitating single ni- trogen vacancy in vacuum

    G. P. Conangla, A. W. Schell, R. A. Rica, and R. Quidant. “Motion control and op- tical interrogation of a levitating single ni- trogen vacancy in vacuum”. Nano Letters 18, 3956–3961 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Dynam- ics of a ferromagnetic particle levitated over a superconductor

    T. Wang, S. Lourette, S. R. O’Kelley, M. Kayci, Y. Band, D. F. J. Kimball, A. O. Sushkov, and D. Budker. “Dynam- ics of a ferromagnetic particle levitated over a superconductor”. Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 044041 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Ultralow mechanical damping with meissner-levitated ferromagnetic micropar- ticles

    A. Vinante, P. Falferi, G. Gasbarri, A. Setter, C. Timberlake, and H. Ul- bricht. “Ultralow mechanical damping with meissner-levitated ferromagnetic micropar- ticles”. Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 064027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Single-spin magnetomechanics with levi- tated micromagnets

    J. Gieseler, A. Kabcenell, E. Rosenfeld, J. D. Schaefer, A. Safira, M. J. A. Schuetz, C.Gonzalez-Ballestero, C.C.Rus- coni, O. Romero-Isart, and M. D. Lukin. “Single-spin magnetomechanics with levi- tated micromagnets”. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 163604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Superfluid helium drops levitated in high vacuum

    C. D. Brown, Y. Wang, M. Namazi, G. I. Harris, M. T. Uysal, and J. G. E. Harris. “Superfluid helium drops levitated in high vacuum”. Physical Review Letters130, 216001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Spin-cooling of the motion of a trapped diamond

    T. Delord, P. Huillery, L. Nicolas, and G. Hétet. “Spin-cooling of the motion of a trapped diamond”. Nature580, 56– 59 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Magnetic torque enhanced bytunabledipolarinteractions

    C. Pellet-Mary, P. Huillery, M. Perdriat, and G. Hétet. “Magnetic torque enhanced bytunabledipolarinteractions”. Phys.Rev. B104, L100411 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Angle locking of a levitating Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.28 diamond using spin diamagnetism

    M. Perdriat, P. Huillery, C. Pellet-Mary, and G. Hétet. “Angle locking of a levitating Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.28 diamond using spin diamagnetism”. Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 117203 (2022)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Ground-state cooling of levitated magnets in low-frequency traps

    K. Streltsov, J. S. Pedernales, and M. B. Plenio. “Ground-state cooling of levitated magnets in low-frequency traps”. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Matter-wave in- terferometry of a levitated thermal nano- oscillator induced and probed by a spin

    M. Scala, M. S. Kim, G. W. Morley, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose. “Matter-wave in- terferometry of a levitated thermal nano- oscillator induced and probed by a spin”. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 180403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Free nano-objectramseyinterferometry forlarge quantum superpositions

    C. Wan, M. Scala, G. W. Morley, A. A. Rahman, H. Ulbricht, J. Bateman, P. F. Barker, S. Bose, and M. S. Kim. “Free nano-objectramseyinterferometry forlarge quantum superpositions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Motional dynamical decoupling for interferometry with macroscopic particles

    J. S. Pedernales, G. W. Morley, and M. B. Plenio. “Motional dynamical decoupling for interferometry with macroscopic particles”. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 023602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Testing quantum gravity by nanodiamond interferometry with nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters

    A. Albrecht, A. Retzker, and M. B. Plenio. “Testing quantum gravity by nanodiamond interferometry with nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters”. PhysicalReviewA90, 033834(2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Ro- bust macroscopic matter-wave interferom- etry with solids

    J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio. “Ro- bust macroscopic matter-wave interferom- etry with solids”. Phys. Rev. A105, 063313 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Long spin coherence and relaxation times in nan- odiamonds milled from polycrystalline 12c diamond

    J. E. March, B. D. Wood, C. J. Stephen, L. D. Fervenza, B. G. Breeze, S. Mandal, A. M. Edmonds, D. J. Twitchen, M. L. Markham, O. A. Williams, et al. “Long spin coherence and relaxation times in nan- odiamonds milled from polycrystalline 12c diamond”. Physical Review Applied20, 044045 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Highdynamicnuclearpo- larization at room temperature

    A. Henstra, T.-S. Lin, J. Schmidt, and W.Wenckebach. “Highdynamicnuclearpo- larization at room temperature”. Chemical Physics Letters165, 6–10 (1990)

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    High proton spin polarization with dnp using the triplet state of pentacene- d14

    T. R. Eichhorn, M. Haag, B. van den Brandt, P. Hautle, and W. Wencke- bach. “High proton spin polarization with dnp using the triplet state of pentacene- d14”. Chemical Physics Letters555, 296– 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Dy- namic nuclear polarisation via the inte- grated solid effect ii: experiments on naphthalene-h8 doped with pentacene- d14

    T. R. Eichhorn, B. v. d. Brandt, P. Hautle, A. Henstra, and W. T. Wenckebach. “Dy- namic nuclear polarisation via the inte- grated solid effect ii: experiments on naphthalene-h8 doped with pentacene- d14”. Molecular Physics112, 1773– 1782 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Mechanisms of dynamic nuclear polarization in insulat- ing solids

    T. Can, Q. Ni, and R. Griffin. “Mechanisms of dynamic nuclear polarization in insulat- ing solids”. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 253, 23–35 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    A transportable neutron spin filter

    Y. Quan, B. van den Brandt, J. Kohlbrecher, W. Wenckebach, and P. Hautle. “A transportable neutron spin filter”. Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A921, 22–26 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Microwave- induced optical nuclear polarization (mi- onp)

    M. Deimling, H. Brunner, K. Dinse, K. Hausser, and J. Colpa. “Microwave- induced optical nuclear polarization (mi- onp)”. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)39, 185–202 (1980)

    work page 1969

  40. [40]

    High proton polarization by microwave-induced optical nuclear polar- ization at 77 k

    M. Iinuma, Y. Takahashi, I. Shaké, M. Oda, A. Masaike, T. Yabuzaki, and H. M. Shimizu. “High proton polarization by microwave-induced optical nuclear polar- ization at 77 k”. Physical Review Letters 84, 171–174 (2000)

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    Polarizing agents beyond pen- tacene for efficient triplet dynamic nuclear polarization in glass matrices

    K. Sakamoto, T. Hamachi, K. Miyokawa, K. Tateishi, T. Uesaka, Y. Kurashige, and N. Yanai. “Polarizing agents beyond pen- tacene for efficient triplet dynamic nuclear polarization in glass matrices”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2307926120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quan- tum information science

    M. R. Wasielewski, M. D. E. Forbes, N. L. Frank, K. Kowalski, G. D. Scholes, J. Yuen- Zhou, M. A. Baldo, D. E. Freedman, R. H. Goldsmith, T. Goodson, M. L. Kirk, J. K. McCusker, J. P. Ogilvie, D. A. Shultz, S. Stoll, and K. B. Whaley. “Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quan- tum information science”. Nature Reviews Chemistry4, 490–504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Use of naph- thalene as a solvent for selective formation of the 1:1 diels-alder adduct of c60 with an- thracene

    K. Komatsu, Y. Murata, N. Sugita, K. Takeuchi, and T. S. Wan. “Use of naph- thalene as a solvent for selective formation of the 1:1 diels-alder adduct of c60 with an- thracene”. Tetrahedron Letters34, 8473– 8476 (1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    Comprehensive organic name re- actions and reagents

    Z. Wang. “Comprehensive organic name re- actions and reagents”. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Gel casting of hydroxyapatite Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.29 with naphthalene as pore former

    S. R. Dash, R. Sarkar, and S. Bhat- tacharyya. “Gel casting of hydroxyapatite Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.29 with naphthalene as pore former”. Ceram- ics International41, 3775–3790 (2015)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Spin filtering neutrons with a proton target dynamically polarized using photo-excited triplet states

    M. Haag, B. van den Brandt, T. R. Eich- horn, P. Hautle, and W. Wenckebach. “Spin filtering neutrons with a proton target dynamically polarized using photo-excited triplet states”. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 678, 91–97 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Hyper- polarized solution-state nmr spectroscopy with optically polarized crystals

    T. R. Eichhorn, A. J. Parker, F. Josten, C. Müller, J. Scheuer, J. M. Steiner, M. Gierse, J. Handwerker, M. Keim, S. Lu- cas, M. U. Qureshi, A. Marshall, A. Salhov, Y. Quan, J. Binder, K. D. Jahnke, P. Neu- mann, S. Knecht, J. W. Blanchard, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, L. Emsley, C. C. Vassil- iou, P. Hautle, and I. Schwartz. “Hyper- polarized solution-state...

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    An epr study of the triplet state of pentacene by electron spin-echo techniques and laser flash excitation

    A. Van Strien and J. Schmidt. “An epr study of the triplet state of pentacene by electron spin-echo techniques and laser flash excitation”. Chemical Physics Letters 70, 513–517 (1980)

    work page 1980

  49. [49]

    Robust optical polariza- tion of nuclear spin baths using hamilto- nian engineering of nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter quantum dynamics

    I. Schwartz, J. Scheuer, B. Tratzmiller, S. Müller, Q. Chen, I. Dhand, Z.-Y. Wang, C. Müller, B. Naydenov, F. Jelezko, and M. B. Plenio. “Robust optical polariza- tion of nuclear spin baths using hamilto- nian engineering of nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter quantum dynamics”. Science Advances 4, eaat8978 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Magic- angle spinning: a historical perspective

    J. W. Hennel and J. Klinowski. “Magic- angle spinning: a historical perspective”. In Topics in Current Chemistry. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Origins of linewidth in h1 magic-angle spinning NMR

    V. E. Zorin, S. P. Brown, and P. Hodgkin- son. “Origins of linewidth in h1 magic-angle spinning NMR”. The Journal of Chemical Physics125, 144508 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Charge den- sity study of naphthalene based on x-ray diffraction data at four different temper- atures and theoretical calculations

    J. Oddershede and S. Larsen. “Charge den- sity study of naphthalene based on x-ray diffraction data at four different temper- atures and theoretical calculations”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A108, 1057–1063 (2004)

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Towards optical mas magnetic resonance using optical traps

    L. Marti, N. Şahin Solmaz, M. Kern, A. Chu, R. Farsi, P. Hengel, J. Gao, N. Alaniva, M. A. Urban, R. Gunzen- hauser, A. Däpp, D. Klose, J. Anders, G. Boero, L. Novotny, M. Frimmer, and A. B. Barnes. “Towards optical mas magnetic resonance using optical traps”. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open18, 100145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Ultrafast magic an- gle spinning solid-state nmr spectroscopy: Advances in methodology and applica- tions

    Y. Nishiyama, G. Hou, V. Agarwal, Y. Su, and A. Ramamoorthy. “Ultrafast magic an- gle spinning solid-state nmr spectroscopy: Advances in methodology and applica- tions”. Chemical Reviews123, 918– 988 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Theory of nanoparti- cle cooling by elliptic coherent scattering

    H. Rudolph, J. Schäfer, B. A. Stickler, and K. Hornberger. “Theory of nanoparti- cle cooling by elliptic coherent scattering”. Physical Review A103, 043514 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum

    Y. Arita, M. Mazilu, and K. Dholakia. “Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum”. Na- ture Communications4, 2374 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Optical rota- tion of levitated spheres in high vacuum

    F. Monteiro, S. Ghosh, E. C. van As- sendelft, and D. C. Moore. “Optical rota- tion of levitated spheres in high vacuum”. Phys. Rev. A97, 051802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    6 ghz hyperfast rotation of an optically levitated nanoparticle in vac- uum

    Y. Jin, J. Yan, S. J. Rahman, J. Li, X. Yu, and J. Zhang. “6 ghz hyperfast rotation of an optically levitated nanoparticle in vac- uum”. Photon. Res.9, 1344–1350 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    The magnetic anisotropy of naphthalene crystals

    S. Bhagavantam. “The magnetic anisotropy of naphthalene crystals”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A124, 545–554 (1929)

    work page 1929

  60. [60]

    CRC handbook of chemistry and physics

    W. M. Haynes, editor. “CRC handbook of chemistry and physics”. CRC Press. (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Ultrafast rota- tion of magnetically levitated macroscopic steel spheres

    M. Schuck, D. Steinert, T. Nussbaumer, and J. W. Kolar. “Ultrafast rota- tion of magnetically levitated macroscopic steel spheres”. Science Advances4, e170151 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Mode of solidification and strength properties(II). naphthalene-benzil binary system

    P. S. Bassi, N. K. Sharma, and M. K. Sharma. “Mode of solidification and strength properties(II). naphthalene-benzil binary system”. Crystal Research and Tech- nology18, 1191–1197 (1983)

    work page 1983

  63. [63]

    Absorp- tion and scattering of light by small parti- cles

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman. “Absorp- tion and scattering of light by small parti- cles”. Wiley. (1998)

    work page 1998

  64. [64]

    Near-field inter- ferometryofafree-fallingnanoparticlefrom Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.30 a point-like source

    J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Horn- berger, and H. Ulbricht. “Near-field inter- ferometryofafree-fallingnanoparticlefrom Accepted in Quantum 2025-11-26, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0.30 a point-like source”. Nature Communica- tions5, 4788 (2014)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Heat capacities, enthalpy increments, and derived thermodynamic functions for naph- thalene between the temperatures 5k and 440k

    R. Chirico, S. Knipmeyer, and W. Steele. “Heat capacities, enthalpy increments, and derived thermodynamic functions for naph- thalene between the temperatures 5k and 440k”. The Journal of Chemical Thermo- dynamics34, 1873–1884 (2002)

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Or- ganicmolecularsolids

    M. Schwoerer and H. C. Wolf. “Or- ganicmolecularsolids”. Wiley-VCH,Berlin. (2006)

    work page 2006

  67. [67]

    High resolution excitation spectroscopy on triplet excitons in organic molecular crystals comparison of naphthalene and anthracene

    H. Port and D. Rund. “High resolution excitation spectroscopy on triplet excitons in organic molecular crystals comparison of naphthalene and anthracene”. Journal of Molecular Structure45, 455–464 (1978)

    work page 1978

  68. [68]

    Opti- cal properties of pentacene thin films and single crystals

    D. Faltermeier, B. Gompf, M. Dressel, A. K. Tripathi, and J. Pflaum. “Opti- cal properties of pentacene thin films and single crystals”. Physical Review B74, 125416 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Sub- limation of moth balls

    K. Tennakone and M. G. C. Peiris. “Sub- limation of moth balls”. American Journal of Physics46, 418–419 (1978)

    work page 1978

  70. [70]

    Recommended vapor pressure of solid naphthalene

    K. Růžička, M. Fulem, and V. Růžička. “Recommended vapor pressure of solid naphthalene”. Journal of Chemical & Engi- neering Data50, 1956–1970 (2005)

    work page 1956

  71. [71]

    On the origin of force sensitivity in tests of quantum gravity with delocalised mechan- ical systems

    J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio. “On the origin of force sensitivity in tests of quantum gravity with delocalised mechan- ical systems”. Contemporary Physics64, 147–163 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven op- tomechanics

    F. Cosco, J. S. Pedernales, and M. B. Plenio. “Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven op- tomechanics”. Physical Review A103, l061501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Large quantum delocalization of a levi- tated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entan- gling via weak forces

    T. Weiss, M. Roda-Llordes, E. Torrontegui, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Romero-Isart. “Large quantum delocalization of a levi- tated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entan- gling via weak forces”. Physical Review Let- ters127, 023601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Large quantum superpositions of a levitated nanodiamond through spin- optomechanical coupling

    Z.-q. Yin, T. Li, X. Zhang, and L. M. Duan. “Large quantum superpositions of a levitated nanodiamond through spin- optomechanical coupling”. Physical Review A88, 033614 (2013)

    work page 2013

  75. [75]

    Spin dynamical decoupling for generating macroscopic superpositions of a free-falling nanodiamond

    B. D. Wood, S. Bose, and G. W. Morley. “Spin dynamical decoupling for generating macroscopic superpositions of a free-falling nanodiamond”. Physical Review A105, 012824 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    The levitron: an adiabatic trap for spins

    M. V. Berry. “The levitron: an adiabatic trap for spins”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A452, 1207– 1220 (1996)

    work page 1996

  77. [77]

    On the dynamical stability of the hover- ing magnetic top

    S. Gov, S. Shtrikman, and H. Thomas. “On the dynamical stability of the hover- ing magnetic top”. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena126, 214–224 (1999)

    work page 1999

  78. [78]

    Dia- magnetic levitation of water realized with a simple device consisting of ordinary per- manent magnets

    T. Naito, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ikezoe. “Dia- magnetic levitation of water realized with a simple device consisting of ordinary per- manent magnets”. Applied Physics Let- ters125(2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Linearstabilityanal- ysis of a levitated nanomagnet in a static magnetic field: Quantum spin stabilized magnetic levitation

    C. C. Rusconi, V. Pöchhacker, J. I. Cirac, andO.Romero-Isart. “Linearstabilityanal- ysis of a levitated nanomagnet in a static magnetic field: Quantum spin stabilized magnetic levitation”. Physical Review B 96, 134419 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Quantum electromechanics with levitated nanopar- ticles

    L. Martinetz, K. Hornberger, J. Millen, M. S. Kim, and B. A. Stickler. “Quantum electromechanics with levitated nanopar- ticles”. npj Quantum Information6, 101 (2020)

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.