pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.01364 · v4 · submitted 2024-09-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc

Angular Momentum Entanglement Mediated By General Relativistic Frame Dragging

Trinidad B. Lanta\~no , Luciano Petruzziello , Susana F. Huelga , Martin B. Plenio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qc
keywords frame dragginggravitationally mediated entanglementangular momentumgeneral relativitydipolar couplingquantum correlationsrotating massesdecoherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Frame dragging induces an effective dipolar coupling between angular momenta of two rotating spherical masses, enabling their entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a general relativistic effect, frame dragging, produces an effective interaction between the angular momenta of two spinning, spherically symmetric masses. This interaction takes the form of a dipolar coupling that can generate quantum entanglement between angular-momentum eigenstates. Entanglement rates are highest for delocalized states, yet measurable correlations appear even from states without superposition. Angular-momentum degrees of freedom remain insensitive to Casimir and Coulomb forces for spherical masses, reducing some decoherence channels that affect other gravitationally mediated entanglement schemes. The work also examines the effect of common noise and outlines possible preparation and detection methods.

Core claim

The frame-dragging effect arising from general relativity produces an effective dipolar coupling between the angular momenta of two rotating, spherically symmetric masses. This coupling permits entanglement generation between angular-momentum degrees of freedom. The states are represented by angular-momentum eigenstates; maximal entangling rates occur for highly delocalized initial states, but non-negligible correlations still arise without initial superposition. For spherical masses the angular-momentum variables are insensitive to Casimir and Coulomb interactions, thereby avoiding key decoherence sources present in other proposals.

What carries the argument

The effective dipolar coupling between angular momenta that is mediated by frame dragging.

If this is right

  • Entanglement arises between angular-momentum eigenstates through this relativistic channel.
  • Correlations appear even when initial states lack superposition.
  • Angular-momentum variables evade Casimir and Coulomb decoherence for spherical masses.
  • The generated entanglement remains robust under several common noise sources.
  • The scheme offers a route to test genuinely relativistic quantum-gravity effects distinct from Newtonian proposals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupling might allow tests of frame-dragging effects with macroscopic rotating objects at laboratory scales.
  • The approach could be extended to explore whether higher-order relativistic corrections modify the entangling rate.
  • It suggests a new experimental handle on quantum information carried by rotational degrees of freedom in curved spacetime.
  • Analogous interactions might appear in other rotating systems where frame dragging is the dominant relativistic correction.

Load-bearing premise

Frame dragging can be isolated from other relativistic corrections and treated as a perturbative dipolar interaction in the low-energy regime without non-spherical mass distributions or additional effects dominating the dynamics.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement that either detects or rules out an entanglement generation rate between the angular momenta of two controlled rotating spherical masses that matches the strength predicted by the frame-dragging dipolar coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.01364 by Luciano Petruzziello, Martin B. Plenio, Susana F. Huelga, Trinidad B. Lanta\~no.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution of the von Neumann entropy as given by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Logarithmic negativity of state (11) as a function of time considering the total number of exchanged quanta in a single colli￾sion to be n = {1, 3, 6}. We study the decoherence of the state given by Eq. (5) in two cases: (a) m = 0 and (b) m = l. the equation reads d dtρˆS(t) = − i ℏ h Hˆ AB I , ρˆS(t) i (13) + X l≥0 X p  Cˆ l,pρˆS(t)Cˆ† l,p − 1 2 {Cˆ† l,pCˆ l,p, ρˆS(t)}  + X l≥0 X p  Fˆ l,pρˆS(t)Fˆ† l,p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Logarithmic negativity of the state given by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two oblate spheroids interact via Newtonian gravity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current proposals to probe the quantum nature of gravity in the low-energy regime predominantly focus on the Newtonian interaction term. In this work, we present a theoretical exploration of gravitationally mediated entanglement arising from a genuinely general relativistic effect: frame dragging. This interaction gives rise to an effective dipolar coupling between the angular momenta of two rotating, spherically symmetric masses, allowing entanglement generation between angular momentum degrees of freedom. We represent the quantum states by angular momentum eigenstates and show that, while the maximal entangling rate is achieved for highly delocalized initial states, non-negligible quantum correlations can still emerge even when the initial states are not prepared in superposition. We then analyze the robustness of the resulting entanglement in the presence of common noise sources, explicitly acknowledging the challenges associated with a potential implementation. We also note that, for spherically symmetric masses, angular momentum degrees of freedom are intrinsically insensitive to Casimir and Coulomb interactions, thereby mitigating key decoherence channels present in existing proposals. Finally, we discuss possible state preparation and detection strategies while framing our results within the broader landscape of gravitationally mediated entanglement schemes, emphasizing the role of this framework as a conceptual avenue for exploring genuinely relativistic quantum gravitational effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the general-relativistic frame-dragging (Lense-Thirring) effect between two rotating, spherically symmetric masses induces an effective dipolar interaction between their angular-momentum operators, J1·J2, that can generate entanglement. States are represented in the angular-momentum eigenbasis; the authors compute entangling rates for both highly delocalized and non-superposed initial states, examine robustness under common noise channels, and argue that spherical symmetry suppresses Casimir and Coulomb decoherence relative to existing proposals. Implementation strategies and placement within the broader gravitationally mediated entanglement literature are discussed.

Significance. If the isolation of the frame-dragging dipolar term can be rigorously established, the work supplies a concrete route to gravitationally mediated entanglement that relies on a purely relativistic correction rather than the Newtonian potential, while offering a built-in mitigation of electromagnetic and Casimir noise for spherical rotors. The explicit use of angular-momentum eigenstates and the noise-robustness analysis constitute useful technical contributions to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (derivation of the effective Hamiltonian): The central claim that the Lense-Thirring interaction produces a clean dipolar J1·J2 term at leading order is not accompanied by an explicit post-Newtonian expansion or scaling bounds on the coupling g(M,r,ω) that demonstrate suppression of higher-order PN corrections, mass-quadrupole back-reaction, and orbital-motion couplings for the chosen spherically symmetric rotors; without these bounds the perturbative isolation asserted in the abstract remains unverified.
  2. [§4] §4 (entanglement dynamics and noise analysis): The reported entangling rates and robustness conclusions presuppose that the frame-dragging coupling dominates the decoherence timescales, yet no quantitative comparison of g to the strength of residual relativistic or environmental terms is supplied, rendering the claim that non-negligible correlations survive for non-superposed states load-bearing but unsecured.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation distinguishing the classical angular-momentum vectors from the quantum operators Ĵ1, Ĵ2 should be made uniform throughout the text and figures.
  2. Figure captions for the entanglement-versus-time plots would benefit from explicit indication of the parameter regime (values of M, r, ω) used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, proposing revisions where the concerns identify genuine gaps in the presented analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (derivation of the effective Hamiltonian): The central claim that the Lense-Thirring interaction produces a clean dipolar J1·J2 term at leading order is not accompanied by an explicit post-Newtonian expansion or scaling bounds on the coupling g(M,r,ω) that demonstrate suppression of higher-order PN corrections, mass-quadrupole back-reaction, and orbital-motion couplings for the chosen spherically symmetric rotors; without these bounds the perturbative isolation asserted in the abstract remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation in §2 applies the standard Lense-Thirring metric and isolates the dipolar term at leading order without an accompanying post-Newtonian expansion or explicit scaling bounds. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that supplies order-of-magnitude scaling arguments for g(M,r,ω). These will show suppression of higher-order PN corrections, quadrupole back-reaction, and orbital couplings by factors of (v/c)^2 and (GM/rc^2) under the slow-rotation, spherical-symmetry assumptions used throughout the paper. This addition will make the perturbative isolation explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (entanglement dynamics and noise analysis): The reported entangling rates and robustness conclusions presuppose that the frame-dragging coupling dominates the decoherence timescales, yet no quantitative comparison of g to the strength of residual relativistic or environmental terms is supplied, rendering the claim that non-negligible correlations survive for non-superposed states load-bearing but unsecured.

    Authors: The referee is correct that §4 presents entangling rates and noise robustness without direct quantitative comparison of the frame-dragging coupling g to residual relativistic or environmental timescales. In the revision we will insert order-of-magnitude estimates in §4 that compare g to the leading residual terms (higher-order gravitational corrections and typical environmental decoherence rates) for the parameter regimes considered. These estimates will be used to qualify the conditions under which non-negligible correlations can survive for non-superposed initial states. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation applies standard GR frame-dragging to angular momentum states.

full rationale

The paper derives an effective dipolar coupling from the Lense-Thirring frame-dragging effect of general relativity applied to two rotating spherically symmetric masses, then uses that Hamiltonian to generate entanglement between angular-momentum eigenstates. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation; the central claim rests on the known perturbative GR interaction treated in the low-energy regime, which is externally verifiable and independent of the present work's results. The abstract and framing explicitly position the result as an application of standard GR rather than a re-derivation or renaming of prior fitted outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the proposal relies on standard general relativity and quantum mechanics without introducing new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms visible at this level.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity in the weak-field, low-energy regime produces a frame-dragging effect that can be mapped to an effective dipolar interaction between angular momenta.
    Invoked when the abstract states that frame dragging gives rise to the effective dipolar coupling.
  • domain assumption Angular momentum eigenstates of spherically symmetric masses remain insensitive to Casimir and Coulomb interactions.
    Stated explicitly in the abstract as a mitigating factor for decoherence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5755 in / 1383 out tokens · 30115 ms · 2026-05-23T21:10:34.606683+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    acquires an even more robust connotation. In our setting, the challenge shifts from preparing spatial superpositions of center-of-mass states to preparing angular momentum eigen- states – which can generate rapid entanglement without be- ing in superposition. Furthermore, the high symmetry of the test masses suggests that this approach may be less vulnera...

    work page

  2. [2]

    C. M. Dewitt and D. Rickles, in The role of gravitation in physics : report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference (2011)

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    N. H. Lindner and A. Peres, Testing quantum superpositions of the gravitational field with Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review A 71, 024101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    A noise inequality for classical forces

    D. Kafri and J. M. Taylor, A noise inequality for classical forces, (2013), arXiv:1311.4558 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Schm ¨ole, M

    J. Schm ¨ole, M. Dragosits, H. Hepach and M. Aspelmeyer, A micromechanical proof-of-principle experiment for measur- ing the gravitational force of milligram masses, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 125031 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toro ˇs, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim and G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Physical Review Letters 119, 240401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Al Balushi, W

    A. Al Balushi, W. Cong and R. B. Mann, Optomechanical quan- tum Cavendish experiment, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043811 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Krisnanda, G

    T. Krisnanda, G. Y . Tham, M. Paternostro and T. Paterek, Ob- servable quantum entanglement due to gravity, npj Quantum In- formation 6, 12 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    H. Miao, D. Martynov, H. Yang and A. Datta, Quantum cor- relations of light mediated by gravity, Physical Review A 101, 063804 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Chevalier, A

    H. Chevalier, A. J. Paige and M. S. Kim, Witnessing the non- classical nature of gravity in the presence of unknown interac- tions, Physical Review A 102, 022428 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    J. S. Pedernales, G. W. Morley and M. B. Plenio, Motional dy- namical decoupling for interferometry with macroscopic parti- cles, Physical Review Letters 125, 023602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Matsumura and K

    A. Matsumura and K. Yamamoto, Gravity-induced entangle- ment in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106021 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Cosco, J

    F. Cosco, J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio, Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven optome- chanics, Physical Review A 103, L061501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Weiss, M

    T. Weiss, M. Roda-Llordes, E. Torrontegui, M. Aspelmeyer and O. Romero-Isart, Large quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sens- ing and entangling via weak forces, Physical Review Letters 127, 023601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    D. Miki, A. Matsumura and K. Yamamoto, Entanglement and decoherence of massive particles due to gravity, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026017 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    J. S. Pedernales, K. Streltsov and M. B. Plenio, Enhancing grav- itational interaction between quantum systems by a massive mediator, Physical Review Letters 128, 110401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to entanglement measures, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    L. Lami, J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio, Testing the quan- tumness of gravity without entanglement, Physical Review X 14, 021022 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Kafri, J

    D. Kafri, J. M. Taylor and G. J. Milburn, A classical channel model for gravitational decoherence, New Journal of Physics 16, 065020 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Kafri, G

    D. Kafri, G. J. Milburn and J. M. Taylor, Bounds on quantum communication via Newtonian gravity, New Journal of Physics 17, 015006 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio, On the origin of force sen- sitivity in tests of quantum gravity with delocalised mechanical systems, Contemp. Phys. 64, 147 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Y . Y . Fein, P. Geyer, P. Zwick, F. Kialka, S. Pedalino, M. Mayor, 16 S. Gerlich and M. Arndt, Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kda, Nature Physics 15, 1242 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Christodoulou and C

    M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of labora- tory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries, Phys. Lett. B 792, 64 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    G ¨ull¨u and B

    I. G ¨ull¨u and B. Tekin, Massive Higher Derivative Gravity in D-dimensional Anti-de Sitter Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 80, 064033 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    G ¨ull¨u and B

    I. G ¨ull¨u and B. Tekin, Spin-Spin Interactions in Massive Grav- ity and Higher Derivative Gravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B 728, 268 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    R. M. Wald, Gravitational spin interaction, Phys. Rev. D 6, 406 (1972)

    work page 1972

  27. [27]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    work page 1973

  28. [28]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

    work page 1972

  29. [29]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 68, 032103 (2003)

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Y . Jin, J. Yan, S. J. Rahman, J. Li, X. Yu and J. Zhang, 6 ghz hyperfast rotation of an optically levitated nanoparticle in vac- uum, Photon. Res. 9, 1344 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    M. B. Plenio, S. Virmani and P. Papadopoulos, Operator mono- tones, the reduction criterion and the relative entropy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, L193 (2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    C. Wang, P. Bai and X. Guo, Advances in separation methods for large-scale production of silicon isotopes, Journal of Radio- analytical and Nuclear Chemistry 304, 989 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Arabgol and T

    M. Arabgol and T. Sleator, Observation of the Nuclear Barnett Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 177202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    G. Afek, F. Monteiro, B. Siegel, J. Wang, S. Dickson, J. Re- coaro, M. Watts and D. C. Moore, Control and measurement of electric dipole moments in levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053512 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    B. M. Latacz et al., Orders of Magnitude Improved Cyclotron- Mode Cooling for Nondestructive Spin Quantum Transition Spectroscopy with Single Trapped Antiprotons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Sellner et al., Improved limit on the directly measured an- tiproton lifetime , New J

    S. Sellner et al., Improved limit on the directly measured an- tiproton lifetime , New J. Phys. 19, 083023 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 090503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    Walter, B

    K. Walter, B. A. Stickler and K. Hornberger, Collisional deco- herence of polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063612 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    B. A. Stickler, B. Papendell and K. Hornberger, Spatio- orientational decoherence of nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033828 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Papendell, B

    B. Papendell, B. A. Stickler and K. Hornberger, Quantum angu- lar momentum diffusion of rigid bodies, New Journal of Physics 19, 122001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Sch ¨afer, B

    J. Sch ¨afer, B. A. Stickler and K. Hornberger, Decoher- ence of dielectric particles by thermal emission, (2024), arXiv:2407.01215 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Bateman, S

    J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger and H. Ulbricht, Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanoparticle from a point-like source, Nature Commun. 5, 4788 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    M. O. E. Steiner, J. S. Pedernales and M. B. Plenio, Pentacene- Doped Naphthalene for Levitated Optomechanics, (2024), arXiv:2405.13869 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Debye, Zur Theorie der spezifischen W¨armen, Annalen Phys

    P. Debye, Zur Theorie der spezifischen W¨armen, Annalen Phys. 344, 789 (1912)

    work page 1912

  46. [46]

    R. K. Iler, The Chemistry of Silica (Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1979)

    work page 1979

  47. [47]

    Higgins, A

    G. Higgins, A. Di Biagio and M. Christodoulou, Truly relativis- tic gravity mediated entanglement protocol using superposi- tions of rotational energies, Phys. Rev. D110, L101901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    T. W. van de Kamp, R. J. Marshman, S. Bose and A. Mazumdar, Quantum gravity witness via entanglement of masses: Casimir screening , Phys. Rev. A 102, 062807 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    S. J. Barnett, Magnetization by Rotation, Phys. Rev. 6, 239 (1915)

    work page 1915

  50. [50]

    Perez-Rios and A

    J. Perez-Rios and A. S. Sanz, How does a magnetic trap work? Am. J. Phys. 81, 836 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Rugar, R

    D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. J. Mamin and B. W. Chui, Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy, Nature 430, 329 (2004)

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    Dania, K

    L. Dania, K. Heidegger, D. S. Bykov, G. Cerchiari, G. Araneda and T. E. Northup, Position Measurement of a Levitated Nanoparticle via Interference with Its Mirror Image, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 013601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    H. C. Fogedby, Field-theoretical approach to open quantum sys- tems and the Lindblad equation, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics , Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum compu- tation (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (1943)

    work page 1943