REVIEW 3 cited by
PaGoDA: Progressive Growing of a One-Step Generator from a Low-Resolution Diffusion Teacher
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The diffusion model performs remarkable in generating high-dimensional content but is computationally intensive, especially during training. We propose Progressive Growing of Diffusion Autoencoder (PaGoDA), a novel pipeline that reduces the training costs through three stages: training diffusion on downsampled data, distilling the pretrained diffusion, and progressive super-resolution. With the proposed pipeline, PaGoDA achieves a $64\times$ reduced cost in training its diffusion model on 8x downsampled data; while at the inference, with the single-step, it performs state-of-the-art on ImageNet across all resolutions from 64x64 to 512x512, and text-to-image. PaGoDA's pipeline can be applied directly in the latent space, adding compression alongside the pre-trained autoencoder in Latent Diffusion Models (e.g., Stable Diffusion). The code is available at https://github.com/sony/pagoda.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Geometry-Preserving Encoder/Decoder in Latent Generative Models
A geometry-preserving encoder/decoder trained by minimizing a logarithmic Gromov-Monge distance converges provably and reconstructs images faster than VAE-based latent generative models.
-
Adversarial Diffusion Compression for Real-World Image Super-Resolution
AdcSR distills OSEDiff into a pruned diffusion-GAN that cuts inference time 3.7x and parameters 74% while achieving comparable super-resolution quality.
-
Inconsistencies In Consistency Models: Better ODE Solving Does Not Imply Better Samples
Directly supervising a consistency model against an ODE solver lowers ODE solving error yet degrades image quality, so better ODE solving does not imply better samples.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.