Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19648 v1 pith:6EUQY3NM submitted 2024-05-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords approachfeaturesdetectinghallucinationslanguagelargelearningllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Concerns regarding the propensity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce inaccurate outputs, also known as hallucinations, have escalated. Detecting them is vital for ensuring the reliability of applications relying on LLM-generated content. Current methods often demand substantial resources and rely on extensive LLMs or employ supervised learning with multidimensional features or intricate linguistic and semantic analyses difficult to reproduce and largely depend on using the same LLM that hallucinated. This paper introduces a supervised learning approach employing two simple classifiers utilizing only four numerical features derived from tokens and vocabulary probabilities obtained from other LLM evaluators, which are not necessarily the same. The method yields promising results, surpassing state-of-the-art outcomes in multiple tasks across three different benchmarks. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive examination of the strengths and weaknesses of our approach, highlighting the significance of the features utilized and the LLM employed as an evaluator. We have released our code publicly at https://github.com/Baylor-AI/HalluDetect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dual-Dimensional Consistency: Balancing Budget and Quality in Adaptive Inference-Time Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DDC reduces token consumption by over 10x in LLM reasoning while maintaining or exceeding baseline accuracy across five benchmarks via adaptive path quality filtering.

  2. Towards Mitigation of Hallucination for LLM-empowered Agents: Progressive Generalization Bound Exploration and Watchdog Monitor

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A black-box hallucination watchdog that stores previously hallucinated queries in a vector database and flags new queries by embedding similarity and semantic entropy.

  3. From Hallucinations to Jailbreaks: Rethinking the Vulnerability of Large Foundation Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper argues hallucinations and jailbreaks share the same optimization dynamics and shows that defenses for one also reduce the other, but the theoretical support is largely circular.

Pith tools