Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20535 v2 pith:AJJMHSJT submitted 2024-05-30 cs.AI cs.CL

Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords codingdatareasoningacrossfamiliesdifferentimpactmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) significantly enhances the zero-shot capabilities of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs). While coding data is known to boost LLM reasoning abilities during pretraining, its role in activating internal reasoning capacities during IFT remains understudied. This paper investigates a key question: How does coding data impact LLMs' reasoning capacities during IFT stage? To explore this, we thoroughly examine the impact of coding data across different coding data proportions, model families, sizes, and reasoning domains, from various perspectives. Specifically, we create three IFT datasets with increasing coding data proportions, fine-tune six LLM backbones across different families and scales on these datasets, evaluate the tuned models' performance across twelve tasks in three reasoning domains, and analyze the outcomes from three broad-to-granular perspectives: overall, domain-level, and task-specific. Our holistic analysis provides valuable insights into each perspective. First, coding data tuning enhances the overall reasoning capabilities of LLMs across different model families and scales. Moreover, while the impact of coding data varies by domain, it shows consistent trends within each domain across different model families and scales. Additionally, coding data generally provides comparable task-specific benefits across model families, with optimal proportions in IFT datasets being task-dependent.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Automatic Textbook Formalization

    cs.AI 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    Multi-agent AI system formalizes entire 500-page graduate algebraic combinatorics textbook into Lean, creating 130K lines of code in one week at human-expert cost.

  2. How Your Credentials Are Leaked by LLM Agent Skills: An Empirical Study

    cs.CR 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    Analysis of 17k LLM agent skills reveals 520 vulnerable ones with 1,708 leakage issues, primarily from debug output exposure, with a 10-pattern taxonomy and released dataset for future detection.

  3. How Your Credentials Are Leaked by LLM Agent Skills: An Empirical Study

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Large-scale audit of SkillsMP agent skills finds 520 skills with 1,708 credential-leak issues, dominated by debug logging into the LLM context and hard-to-remediate forks.