Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Large Language Model Sentinel: LLM Agent for Adversarial Purification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20770 v4 pith:Z3YHUWEC submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
keywords adversarialdefensellmsagentattacksexampleslanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past two years, the use of large language models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. While these LLMs offer considerable convenience, they also raise security concerns, as LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS), which is designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs by purifying the adversarial textual examples before feeding them into the target LLM. Our method comprises two main components: a) Agent instruction, which can simulate a new agent for adversarial defense, altering minimal characters to maintain the original meaning of the sentence while defending against attacks; b) Defense guidance, which provides strategies for modifying clean or adversarial examples to ensure effective defense and accurate outputs from the target LLMs. Remarkably, the defense agent demonstrates robust defensive capabilities even without learning from adversarial examples. Additionally, we conduct an intriguing adversarial experiment where we develop two agents, one for defense and one for attack, and engage them in mutual confrontation. During the adversarial interactions, neither agent completely beat the other. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively defends against adversarial attacks, thereby enhancing adversarial robustness.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Heterogeneous LLM Debate Under Adversarial Peers: Honest Gains, Replacement Costs, and Resilience

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Honest heterogeneous peers in LLM debates lower harmful revision rates (e.g., 89% to 35%), while adversarial peers raise them (to 90%), and provide defense even against same-family adversaries.

  2. EvoEmo: Towards Evolved Emotional Policies for Adversarial LLM Agents in Multi-Turn Price Negotiation

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    EvoEmo evolves emotion-transition policies for buyer LLM agents and reports higher savings, success rates, and efficiency than vanilla or fixed-emotion baselines in simulated price negotiations.

  3. Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Corruptions via Node Contribution Backpropagation

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A backward-propagation scoring scheme over a signed temporal DAG can identify malicious agents in LLM multi-agent systems and cut their communications, improving defended accuracy by 3–7 percentage points in the autho...

  4. Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges

    cs.CL 2025-03 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.

Pith tools