REVIEW 2 cited by
Memorization in deep learning: A survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep Learning (DL) powered by Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has revolutionized various domains, yet understanding the intricacies of DNN decision-making and learning processes remains a significant challenge. Recent investigations have uncovered an interesting memorization phenomenon in which DNNs tend to memorize specific details from examples rather than learning general patterns, affecting model generalization, security, and privacy. This raises critical questions about the nature of generalization in DNNs and their susceptibility to security breaches. In this survey, we present a systematic framework to organize memorization definitions based on the generalization and security/privacy domains and summarize memorization evaluation methods at both the example and model levels. Through a comprehensive literature review, we explore DNN memorization behaviors and their impacts on security and privacy. We also introduce privacy vulnerabilities caused by memorization and the phenomenon of forgetting and explore its connection with memorization. Furthermore, we spotlight various applications leveraging memorization and forgetting mechanisms, including noisy label learning, privacy preservation, and model enhancement. This survey offers the first-in-kind understanding of memorization in DNNs, providing insights into its challenges and opportunities for enhancing AI development while addressing critical ethical concerns.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Localizing and Mitigating Memorization in Image Autoregressive Models
Memorization in image autoregressive models sits in early blocks at coarse scales for VAR models and in middle/late blocks for RAR models; halving the flagged neurons' weights cuts extractable images by 65 to 84 percent.
-
Differential-informed Sample Selection Accelerates Multimodal Contrastive Learning
DISSect selects training samples for multimodal contrastive learning by ranking the difference between historical and current model similarity scores, matching full-data performance with 70% fewer samples.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.