Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ask LLMs Directly, "What shapes your bias?": Measuring Social Bias in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04064 v1 pith:G3IQSYXV submitted 2024-06-06 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords socialbiasllmsperceptionsidentitiesbiasesdemographicdirectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social bias is shaped by the accumulation of social perceptions towards targets across various demographic identities. To fully understand such social bias in large language models (LLMs), it is essential to consider the composite of social perceptions from diverse perspectives among identities. Previous studies have either evaluated biases in LLMs by indirectly assessing the presence of sentiments towards demographic identities in the generated text or measuring the degree of alignment with given stereotypes. These methods have limitations in directly quantifying social biases at the level of distinct perspectives among identities. In this paper, we aim to investigate how social perceptions from various viewpoints contribute to the development of social bias in LLMs. To this end, we propose a novel strategy to intuitively quantify these social perceptions and suggest metrics that can evaluate the social biases within LLMs by aggregating diverse social perceptions. The experimental results show the quantitative demonstration of the social attitude in LLMs by examining social perception. The analysis we conducted shows that our proposed metrics capture the multi-dimensional aspects of social bias, enabling a fine-grained and comprehensive investigation of bias in LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Empirical Study of Group Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In multi-agent LLM debates, neutral agents conform to both numerical majority and higher-intelligence agents, with a single smart agent often outweighing a larger group.

Pith tools