Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

VHDL-Eval: A Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in VHDL Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04379 v1 pith:2IEONRGW submitted 2024-06-06 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.CL
keywords vhdlcodegenerationllmsevaluationlanguagesmodelsproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the unprecedented advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), their application domains have expanded to include code generation tasks across various programming languages. While significant progress has been made in enhancing LLMs for popular programming languages, there exists a notable gap in comprehensive evaluation frameworks tailored for Hardware Description Languages (HDLs), particularly VHDL. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a comprehensive evaluation framework designed specifically for assessing LLM performance in VHDL code generation task. We construct a dataset for evaluating LLMs on VHDL code generation task. This dataset is constructed by translating a collection of Verilog evaluation problems to VHDL and aggregating publicly available VHDL problems, resulting in a total of 202 problems. To assess the functional correctness of the generated VHDL code, we utilize a curated set of self-verifying testbenches specifically designed for those aggregated VHDL problem set. We conduct an initial evaluation of different LLMs and their variants, including zero-shot code generation, in-context learning (ICL), and Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods. Our findings underscore the considerable challenges faced by existing LLMs in VHDL code generation, revealing significant scope for improvement. This study emphasizes the necessity of supervised fine-tuning code generation models specifically for VHDL, offering potential benefits to VHDL designers seeking efficient code generation solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProtocolLLM: RTL Benchmark for SystemVerilog Generation of Communication Protocols

    cs.AR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, ProtocolLLM, evaluates LLM-generated SystemVerilog for SPI, I2C, UART, and AXI and finds most models fail timing-accurate functional checks.

Pith tools