pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.07351 · v4 · submitted 2024-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.chem-ph

Correcting Delocalization Error in Materials with Localized Orbitals and Linear-Response Screening

Jacob Z. Williams , Weitao Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-ph
keywords delocalization errordensity functional theoryband gapsmaterialslocalized orbitalslinear-response screeningDFT corrections
0
0 comments X

The pith

lrLOSC corrects delocalization error in materials by combining localized orbitals with linear-response screening.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces lrLOSC to fix delocalization error in density functional theory for materials, which causes underestimated band gaps and interface problems. The method applies localized orbitals and linear-response screening to achieve accurate fundamental gap predictions across a wide range of band gaps. It reports that eleven materials' gaps are predicted to within 0.22 eV, with a nonzero total energy correction provided. The same framework improves molecular properties and aims at consistent DFT treatment of molecules, materials, and their interfaces.

Core claim

lrLOSC corrects delocalization error in materials over a wide range of band gaps by constructing localized orbitals and applying linear-response screening, yielding fundamental gap predictions for eleven materials within 0.22 eV along with a nonzero total energy correction.

What carries the argument

lrLOSC, the correction that uses localized orbital construction plus linear-response screening to adjust the DFT functional and reduce delocalization error in periodic systems.

Load-bearing premise

The linear-response screening and localized-orbital construction remain accurate and transferable when applied to periodic solids without additional system-specific adjustments beyond those used for molecules.

What would settle it

Experimental band gap measurements on the eleven tested materials that deviate from the lrLOSC predictions by more than 0.22 eV on average would show the claimed accuracy does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.07351 by Jacob Z. Williams, Weitao Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. LiF band structure by PBE and lrLOSC. Purple dashed lines (top to bottom): ZPR-corrected experimental gap, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fundamental gaps predicted by lrLOSC vs. by PBE. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. SiC band structure. Purple dashed line: ZPR-corrected experimental gap. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. NaF band structure. Purple dashed line: ZPR-corrected experimental gap. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Delocalization error prevents density functional theory (DFT) from reaching its full potential, causing problems like systematically underestimated band gaps and misaligned energy levels at interfaces. We introduce lrLOSC to correct delocalization error in materials over a wide range of band gaps. We predict eleven materials' fundamental gaps to within 0.22 eV, while offering a nonzero total energy correction; molecular properties are improved with a parallel implementation of the same theory [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 16, 2492 (2025)]. lrLOSC is an essential step toward modeling molecules, materials, and their interfaces within the same DFT framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces lrLOSC, an extension of the localized orbital scaling correction that incorporates linear-response screening to address delocalization error in DFT calculations for periodic materials. It reports that this approach predicts the fundamental band gaps of eleven materials to within 0.22 eV while also supplying a nonzero total-energy correction, and notes a parallel molecular implementation.

Significance. If the central numerical results hold under independent scrutiny, the work would offer a useful step toward consistent DFT treatment of delocalization error across molecules, solids, and interfaces. The emphasis on a nonzero total-energy correction and the absence of additional free parameters (per the axiom ledger) are positive features that distinguish the claim from purely empirical gap corrections.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that eleven materials' gaps are predicted 'to within 0.22 eV' is presented without error bars, explicit comparison to independent benchmarks, or details on how the eleven materials were selected, making it impossible to judge whether the accuracy is robust or sensitive to post-hoc choices.
  2. [Methods / Results] The transferability assumption underlying the central claim—that the linear-response screening kernel and orbital-localization procedure calibrated on molecules remain accurate for periodic solids without system-specific adjustments—is not accompanied by explicit tests (e.g., k-point convergence of the response or comparison against known dielectric constants). This assumption is load-bearing for the reported 0.22 eV accuracy on solids.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the screening parameters in the periodic case should be clarified to distinguish any adaptations from the molecular implementation cited in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that eleven materials' gaps are predicted 'to within 0.22 eV' is presented without error bars, explicit comparison to independent benchmarks, or details on how the eleven materials were selected, making it impossible to judge whether the accuracy is robust or sensitive to post-hoc choices.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from added context on material selection and error characterization. The eleven materials were chosen to span a representative range of band gaps (small-gap semiconductors to wide-gap insulators) and are explicitly listed with their computed and experimental gaps in Table I and Section III. The quoted 0.22 eV is the mean absolute error relative to experiment. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to state the selection criteria, report the MAE together with its standard deviation, and note comparisons against PBE, hybrid functionals, and GW benchmarks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods / Results] The transferability assumption underlying the central claim—that the linear-response screening kernel and orbital-localization procedure calibrated on molecules remain accurate for periodic solids without system-specific adjustments—is not accompanied by explicit tests (e.g., k-point convergence of the response or comparison against known dielectric constants). This assumption is load-bearing for the reported 0.22 eV accuracy on solids.

    Authors: The lrLOSC screening kernel is obtained directly from the density-density response function evaluated for each periodic system using the identical localized-orbital formalism employed for molecules; no material-specific parameters are introduced. Standard k-point convergence of the response was performed for all solids (details in the SI), and the resulting gaps match experiment to 0.22 eV across chemically diverse systems. We will expand the Methods section to document the k-point convergence thresholds explicitly and add a short comparison of the computed screening to known dielectric constants for the subset of materials where such data exist. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe lrLOSC as an application of linear-response screening and localized orbitals to periodic materials, with a parallel molecular implementation cited to a separate 2025 publication. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, or self-citation chains are quoted that reduce the gap predictions or total-energy corrections to inputs by construction. The central claims rest on transferability of the functional form rather than on any exhibited self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work. This qualifies as a normal non-finding under the guidelines.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated without the methods section. The approach likely inherits standard DFT assumptions plus new choices for orbital localization and response screening whose independence from the target gaps is unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1125 out tokens · 15981 ms · 2026-05-23T23:59:31.721823+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    It adapts the KCW module [45], leveraging its imple- mentation of the monochromatic decomposition and its linear-response routines

    of wannier90 [74–76], and lrLOSC is implemented in a local fork of Quantum ESPRESSO ’s development ver- sion. It adapts the KCW module [45], leveraging its imple- mentation of the monochromatic decomposition and its linear-response routines. TABLE I. Theoretical and experimental core-level quasipar- ticle energies and electronic gap of LiF (all in eV). G0...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  4. [4]

    Levy, Proc

    M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 6062 (1979)

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Levy, Phys

    M. Levy, Phys. Rev. A 26, 1200 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    E. H. Lieb, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 24, 243 (1983)

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115123 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [9]

    J. F. Janak, Phys. Rev. B 18, 7165 (1978)

    work page 1978

  9. [10]

    J. P. Perdew, R. G. Parr, M. Levy, and J. L. Balduz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1691 (1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [11]

    W. Yang, Y. Zhang, and P. W. Ayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5172 (2000)

    work page 2000

  11. [12]

    J. P. Perdew, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 28, 497 (1985)

    work page 1985

  12. [13]

    M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986)

    work page 1986

  13. [14]

    I. Dabo, A. Ferretti, N. Poilvert, Y. Li, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115121 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [15]

    Tsuneda, J.-W

    T. Tsuneda, J.-W. Song, S. Suzuki, and K. Hirao, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 174101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [16]

    Kronik, T

    L. Kronik, T. Stein, S. Refaely-Abramson, and R. Baer, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1515 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [17]

    K¨ orzd¨ orfer, R

    T. K¨ orzd¨ orfer, R. M. Parrish, N. Marom, J. S. Sears, C. D. Sherrill, and J.-L. Br´ edas, Phys. Rev. B86, 205110 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [18]

    Puschnig, A

    P. Puschnig, A. D. Boese, M. Willenbockel, M. Meyer, D. L¨ uftner, E. M. Reinisch, T. Ules, G. Koller, S. Soubatch, M. G. Ramsey, and F. S. Tautz, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 208 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [20]

    H. Xiao, J. Tahir-Kheli, and W. A. I. Goddard, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 212 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [21]

    S. Wang, T. Sakurai, W. Wen, and Y. Qi, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1800260 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [22]

    Li, Y.-L

    Y. Li, Y.-L. Li, B. Sa, and R. Ahuja, Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 545 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [23]

    Ishii, K

    H. Ishii, K. Sugiyama, E. Ito, and K. Seki, Advanced Materials 11, 605 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [24]

    Braun, W

    S. Braun, W. R. Salaneck, and M. Fahlman, Advanced Materials 21, 1450 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [25]

    Kroemer, Rev

    H. Kroemer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 783 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [26]

    Nature Mater 11, 91 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [27]

    Mori-S´ anchez, A

    P. Mori-S´ anchez, A. J. Cohen, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 146401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [28]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sanchez, and W. Yang, Science321, 792 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [29]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, and W. Yang, Chem. Rev. 112, 289 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [30]

    K. R. Bryenton, A. A. Adeleke, S. G. Dale, and E. R. Johnson, WIREs Computational Molecular Science n/a, e1631 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [33]

    Y. Mei, N. Yang, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 054302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [34]

    Y. Mei, C. Li, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 666 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [35]

    J. Li, Y. Jin, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 6 156, 154101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [36]

    Zheng, A

    X. Zheng, A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, X. Hu, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 026403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [37]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Zheng, C. Li, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 154113 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [39]

    W. Yang, A. J. Cohen, F. De Proft, and P. Geerlings, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 144110 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [40]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. Yang, X. Zheng, and W. Yang, Molecular Physics 116, 927 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [41]

    X. Yang, X. Zheng, and W. Yang, Front. Chem.8 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [42]

    J. Yu, Y. Mei, Z. Chen, and W. Yang, Accurate Pre- diction of Core Level Binding Energies from Ground- State Density Functional Calculations: The Importance of Localization and Screening (2024), arXiv:2406.06345 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [43]

    Mahler, J

    A. Mahler, J. Williams, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035147 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [44]

    N. L. Nguyen, N. Colonna, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021051 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [45]

    Colonna, N

    N. Colonna, N. L. Nguyen, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 2549 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [47]

    Ma and L.-W

    J. Ma and L.-W. Wang, Sci. Rep. 6, 24924 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [48]

    M. Weng, S. Li, J. Ma, J. Zheng, F. Pan, and L.-W. Wang, Applied Physics Letters 111, 054101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [49]

    S. Li, M. Weng, J. Jie, J. Zheng, F. Pan, and L.-W. Wang, EPL 123, 37002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [50]

    M. Weng, S. Li, J. Zheng, F. Pan, and L.-W. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 281 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [51]

    M. Weng, F. Pan, and L.-W. Wang, npj Comput Mater 6, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [52]

    D. Wing, G. Ohad, J. B. Haber, M. R. Filip, S. E. Gant, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2104556118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [53]

    G. Ohad, D. Wing, S. E. Gant, A. V. Cohen, J. B. Haber, F. Sagredo, M. R. Filip, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 104606 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [54]

    Wannier Functions Dually Localized in Space and Energy

    A. Mahler, J. Z. Williams, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, Wan- nier Functions Dually Localized in Space and Energy (2022), arXiv:2201.07751v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [55]

    G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 52, 191 (1937)

    work page 1937

  50. [56]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    work page 1997

  51. [57]

    J. Yu, N. Q. Su, and W. Yang, JACS Au 2, 1383 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [58]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gian- nozzi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    work page 2001

  53. [60]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on the monochromatic decomposi- tion of the curvature; a note on symmetry and degener- acy; the unit-cell periodicity of κ; and the data underly- ing FIG. 2. It also contains references [81–86]

    work page

  54. [61]

    N.-P. Wang, M. Rohlfing, P. Kr¨ uger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 67, 115111 (2003)

    work page 2003

  55. [62]

    L. I. Johansson and S. B. M. Hagstr¨ om, Phys. Scr. 14, 55 (1976)

    work page 1976

  56. [64]

    Miglio, V

    A. Miglio, V. Brousseau-Couture, E. Godbout, G. Anto- nius, Y.-H. Chan, S. G. Louie, M. Cˆ ot´ e, M. Giantomassi, and X. Gonze, npj Comput Mater 6, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [66]

    E. A. Vo, X. Wang, and T. C. Berkelbach, The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 044106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [67]

    Chen and A

    W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, Phys. Rev. B 92, 041115 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [68]

    Lei and T

    J. Lei and T. Zhu, J. Chem. Phys. 157, 214114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [69]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    work page 2009

  61. [70]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Ko...

    work page 2017

  62. [71]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf` a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, and S. Baroni, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 154105 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [73]

    D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [75]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vander- bilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Communications 178, 685 (2008)

    work page 2008

  65. [76]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Com- munications 185, 2309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [77]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- weiser, J. Qiao, F. Th¨ ole, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbi...

    work page 2020

  67. [78]

    Y. Mei, Z. Chen, and W. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 10269 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [79]

    Flores, J

    F. Flores, J. Ortega, and H. V´ azquez, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 8658 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [80]

    D. A. Egger, Z.-F. Liu, J. B. Neaton, and L. Kronik, Nano Lett. 15, 2448 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [81]

    Z.-F. Liu, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 054103 (2020). 7

    work page 2020

  71. [85]

    Ralph. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, 2nd ed. (Wi- ley, New York, 1973)

    work page 1973

  72. [87]

    R. T. Poole, J. G. Jenkin, J. Liesegang, and R. C. G. Leckey, Phys. Rev. B 11, 5179 (1975). Supplemental Material: Localized Orbital Scaling Correction with Linear Response in Materials Jacob Z. Williams and Weitao Yang ∗ Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA † (Dated: July 3, 2024) MONOCHROMA TIC IMPLEMENT A TION OF THE CUR V A ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1975

  73. [88]

    CX = 0.75 3 √ 6/πis the Dirac exchange constant [7, 8]

    is chosen so that the self-exchange in any one-electron density is twice that of the same density with half an electron. CX = 0.75 3 √ 6/πis the Dirac exchange constant [7, 8]. 4 This curvature corrects delocalization error in small molecules effectively, but the screen- ing of the Coulomb repulsion by lattice electrons means that it overcorrects band ene...

    work page

  74. [89]

    All computations use the PBE functional [13], and the Jii0 values are in rydbergs

    for isolated systems like water. All computations use the PBE functional [13], and the Jii0 values are in rydbergs. We simulated a single water molecule in a 25 ˚A cubic cell, with a kinetic energy cutoff of 100 Ry; to emulate an isolated system, it is sampled only at the origin Γ of the Brillouin zone. We compare it against the in-house QM4D code, using ...

    work page

  75. [90]

    W. Yang, A. J. Cohen, and P. Mori-S´ anchez, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 204111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [91]

    Y. Mei, Z. Chen, and W. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 7236 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [92]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    work page 1976

  78. [93]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    work page 2001

  79. [94]

    Timrov, N

    I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [95]

    Colonna, R

    N. Colonna, R. De Gennaro, E. Linscott, and N. Marzari, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 5435 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.