REVIEW 2 cited by
Beyond ELBOs: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Variational Methods for Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Monte Carlo methods, Variational Inference, and their combinations play a pivotal role in sampling from intractable probability distributions. However, current studies lack a unified evaluation framework, relying on disparate performance measures and limited method comparisons across diverse tasks, complicating the assessment of progress and hindering the decision-making of practitioners. In response to these challenges, our work introduces a benchmark that evaluates sampling methods using a standardized task suite and a broad range of performance criteria. Moreover, we study existing metrics for quantifying mode collapse and introduce novel metrics for this purpose. Our findings provide insights into strengths and weaknesses of existing sampling methods, serving as a valuable reference for future developments. The code is publicly available here.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Continuously Tempered Diffusion Samplers
CTDS trains neural samplers with a controlled Langevin dynamics over both position and a continuous temperature coordinate, and reports improved sampling on a 40-mode Gaussian mixture.
-
Towards Adaptive External Communication in Autonomous Vehicles: A Conceptual Design Framework
A three-layer framework (input, processing, output) for adaptive external human-machine interfaces in autonomous vehicles is introduced to systematize design and analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.