REVIEW 2 cited by
Nystr\"om Kernel Stein Discrepancy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Kernel methods underpin many of the most successful approaches in data science and statistics, and they allow representing probability measures as elements of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space without loss of information. Recently, the kernel Stein discrepancy (KSD), which combines Stein's method with the flexibility of kernel techniques, gained considerable attention. Through the Stein operator, KSD allows the construction of powerful goodness-of-fit tests where it is sufficient to know the target distribution up to a multiplicative constant. However, the typical U- and V-statistic-based KSD estimators suffer from a quadratic runtime complexity, which hinders their application in large-scale settings. In this work, we propose a Nystr\"om-based KSD acceleration -- with runtime $\mathcal O\left(mn+m^3\right)$ for $n$ samples and $m\ll n$ Nystr\"om points -- , show its $\sqrt{n}$-consistency with a classical sub-Gaussian assumption, and demonstrate its applicability for goodness-of-fit testing on a suite of benchmarks. We also show the $\sqrt n$-consistency of the quadratic-time KSD estimator.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DriftXpress: Faster Drifting Models via Projected RKHS Fields
DriftXpress approximates the attraction field of drifting models with a Nyström landmark projection, reducing training time by 2.6–6.7× at comparable FID.
-
Minimax Estimation of Kernel Stein Discrepancy: Trace versus Hilbert-Schmidt Scales
Minimax risk for estimating KSD is governed by the Hilbert–Schmidt norm of the Stein covariance, attained by a square-root U-statistic but not by the standard V-statistic.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.