Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MMFakeBench: A Mixed-Source Multimodal Misinformation Detection Benchmark for LVLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08772 v3 pith:WMR3ZRRX submitted 2024-06-13 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords misinformationmixed-sourcedetectionmethodsmmfakebenchbenchmarkdistortionforgery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current multimodal misinformation detection (MMD) methods often assume a single source and type of forgery for each sample, which is insufficient for real-world scenarios where multiple forgery sources coexist. The lack of a benchmark for mixed-source misinformation has hindered progress in this field. To address this, we introduce MMFakeBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for mixed-source MMD. MMFakeBench includes 3 critical sources: textual veracity distortion, visual veracity distortion, and cross-modal consistency distortion, along with 12 sub-categories of misinformation forgery types. We further conduct an extensive evaluation of 6 prevalent detection methods and 15 Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) on MMFakeBench under a zero-shot setting. The results indicate that current methods struggle under this challenging and realistic mixed-source MMD setting. Additionally, we propose MMD-Agent, a novel approach to integrate the reasoning, action, and tool-use capabilities of LVLM agents, significantly enhancing accuracy and generalization. We believe this study will catalyze future research into more realistic mixed-source multimodal misinformation and provide a fair evaluation of misinformation detection methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XFacta is a new real-world, post-January-2024 multimodal misinformation dataset from X, and evaluations show that MLLM detectors need external evidence, especially image-to-text evidence, with multi-step reasoning per...

  2. RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 6K-claim benchmark evaluates LLMs and multimodal LLMs on real-world fact-checking with an explicit 'unknown' option and shows web search and multimodal input improve performance.

  3. Truth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation Detection

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 16 datasets, trainable misinformation detectors drop sharply under LLM-induced surface rewrites, and LLM-based rewriting helps recover accuracy but with important caveats.

  4. Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Attention-Based GNNs

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A graph neural network that compares an evidence graph from reverse-image-search web pages against a claim graph detects out-of-context misinformation with 93.05% accuracy on a 461-sample overlap subset of Factify.

Pith tools