REVIEW 4 cited by
MMFakeBench: A Mixed-Source Multimodal Misinformation Detection Benchmark for LVLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Current multimodal misinformation detection (MMD) methods often assume a single source and type of forgery for each sample, which is insufficient for real-world scenarios where multiple forgery sources coexist. The lack of a benchmark for mixed-source misinformation has hindered progress in this field. To address this, we introduce MMFakeBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for mixed-source MMD. MMFakeBench includes 3 critical sources: textual veracity distortion, visual veracity distortion, and cross-modal consistency distortion, along with 12 sub-categories of misinformation forgery types. We further conduct an extensive evaluation of 6 prevalent detection methods and 15 Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) on MMFakeBench under a zero-shot setting. The results indicate that current methods struggle under this challenging and realistic mixed-source MMD setting. Additionally, we propose MMD-Agent, a novel approach to integrate the reasoning, action, and tool-use capabilities of LVLM agents, significantly enhancing accuracy and generalization. We believe this study will catalyze future research into more realistic mixed-source multimodal misinformation and provide a fair evaluation of misinformation detection methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs
XFacta is a new real-world, post-January-2024 multimodal misinformation dataset from X, and evaluations show that MLLM detectors need external evidence, especially image-to-text evidence, with multi-step reasoning per...
-
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
A new 6K-claim benchmark evaluates LLMs and multimodal LLMs on real-world fact-checking with an explicit 'unknown' option and shows web search and multimodal input improve performance.
-
Truth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation Detection
Across 16 datasets, trainable misinformation detectors drop sharply under LLM-induced surface rewrites, and LLM-based rewriting helps recover accuracy but with important caveats.
-
Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Attention-Based GNNs
A graph neural network that compares an evidence graph from reverse-image-search web pages against a claim graph detects out-of-context misinformation with 93.05% accuracy on a 461-sample overlap subset of Factify.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.